Ryan Michael and Amy L Stuart 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 015001 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/1/015001
Ryan Michael and Amy L Stuart1
Show affiliationsPart of Focus on Connections between Atmospheric Chemistry and Snow and Ice
We develop and apply a mechanistic model for the study and prediction of volatile chemical partitioning during wet growth of a hailstone. The model estimates the fraction of a chemical's mass in the impinging drops that is retained in a two-phase hailstone. It is derived from mass and rate balances over solute and water for steady accretion conditions. We applied the model using a modified Monte Carlo ensemble simulation approach to study the impact of chemical, environmental, and hail-specific input variables on the predicted retention fraction for six atmospherically relevant volatile chemical species, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen peroxide, ammonia, nitric acid, formaldehyde, and formic acid. Individual input variables found to significantly influence retention are the ice–liquid interface supercooling, the liquid water content of the hail, and the effective Henry's constant. The retention fraction increased with increasing values of these variables. Conversely, the ice–liquid distribution coefficient and hail diameter were found to have negligible effects on solute retention. The overall range of simulated retention fraction was from 1 × 10−8 to 1, while ensemble mean retentions for fixed values of individual input variables ranged from 9 × 10−7 to 0.3. No single variable was found to control the extremes; rather they are due to combinations of model input variables.
92.60.Jq Water in the atmosphere (humidity, clouds, evaporation, precipitation)
92.60.Nv Cloud physics; stratus and cumulus clouds
92.60.hf Tropospheric composition and chemistry, constituent transport and chemistry
Issue 1 (January-March 2009)
Received 11 September 2008, accepted for publication 28 November 2008
Published 13 January 2009
Ryan Michael and Amy L Stuart 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 015001
J R Cary et al 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 78 012086
Olaf Stenzel 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 055312
Szymon P Malinowski et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 075020
A S Bradley et al 2005 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38 4259
C W Gardiner and A S Bradley 2001 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34 4663
Junya Suehiro et al 2003 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 L109
Chiara Neto et al 2005 Rep. Prog. Phys. 68 2859
Angela Wilkinson and Esther Eidinow 2008 Environ. Res. Lett. 3 045017
M K Olsen et al 2006 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 39 2515