T Sloan and A W Wolfendale 2008 Environ. Res. Lett. 3 024001 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/024001
T Sloan1 and A W Wolfendale2
Show affiliationsA decrease in the globally averaged low level cloud cover, deduced from the ISCCP infrared data, as the cosmic ray intensity decreased during the solar cycle 22 was observed by two groups. The groups went on to hypothesize that the decrease in ionization due to cosmic rays causes the decrease in cloud cover, thereby explaining a large part of the currently observed global warming. We have examined this hypothesis to look for evidence to corroborate it. None has been found and so our conclusions are to doubt it. From the absence of corroborative evidence, we estimate that less than 23%, at the 95% confidence level, of the 11 year cycle change in the globally averaged cloud cover observed in solar cycle 22 is due to the change in the rate of ionization from the solar modulation of cosmic rays.
92.60.Nv Cloud physics; stratus and cumulus clouds
96.50.Wx Solar cycle variations
Issue 2 (April-June 2008)
Received 31 January 2008, accepted for publication 14 March 2008
Published 3 April 2008
T Sloan and A W Wolfendale 2008 Environ. Res. Lett. 3 024001
D Stamopoulos et al 2007 Nanotechnology 18 495102
Tommaso Roscilde and Stephan Haas 2006 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 39 S153
M Herrmann et al 2007 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 20 1108
Zhang Yanzong et al 2008 Plasma Sci. Technol. 10 358
D Estep et al 2008 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 125 012075
plasma
K Kurihara and M Sekine 1996 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 5 121
I N Bernstein et al 1973 Russ. Math. Surv. 28 17
Neil Turok and Paul J Steinhardt 2005 Phys. Scr. 2005 76
J T Chalker and P D Coddington 1988 J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 21 2665