Patricia Thornley 2008 Environ. Res. Lett. 3 014004 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/1/014004
Patricia Thornley
Show affiliationsGenerating electricity from biomass generates airborne pollution from the thermal conversion facility, but also from the upstream activities required to produce, process and provide the biomass. It is important that this is recognized in environmental evaluations of biomass power plants. Previous work had shown that off-site emissions could be significant for at least two particular bioenergy plants, but had not examined the extent to which this was likely to be generally applicable for a range of technologies and feedstocks; nor identified which steps were most likely to cause significant pollution. A number of bioenergy systems were modelled over whole life cycle to evaluate direct airborne emissions for short rotation coppice and miscanthus energy crops. This showed that CO and hydrocarbon emissions arise predominantly at the thermal conversion plant but up to 44% of NOx and 70% of particulate emissions could be released upstream. Transportation is a minor contributor; with harvesting and tractor transport potentially most significant.
84.60.Rb Thermoelectric, electrogasdynamic and other direct energy conversion
Issue 1 (January-March 2008)
Received 28 November 2007, accepted for publication 27 February 2008
Published 13 March 2008
Patricia Thornley 2008 Environ. Res. Lett. 3 014004
Leonid M. Ozernoy et al 2000 ApJ 537 L147
S. Kafka et al. 2007 The Astronomical Journal 133 1645
M. F. Corcoran 2005 The Astronomical Journal 129 2018
Felipe Menanteau and John P. Hughes 2009 ApJ 694 L136
Yanga R. Fernández et al. 2003 The Astronomical Journal 126 1563
2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 045101
A. Reimer et al. 2006 ApJ 644 1118
F. Krząkała and L. Zdeborová 2008 EPL 81 57005
Martin Cohen et al. 1999 The Astronomical Journal 117 1864