Rhodri Armour et al 2007 Bioinspir. Biomim. 2 S65 doi:10.1088/1748-3182/2/3/S01
Rhodri Armour, Keith Paskins, Adrian Bowyer, Julian Vincent and William Megill
Show affiliationsThis paper introduces jumping robots as a means to traverse rough terrain; such terrain can pose problems for traditional wheeled, tracked and legged designs. The diversity of jumping mechanisms found in nature is explored to support the theory that jumping is a desirable ability for a robot locomotion system to incorporate, and then the size-related constraints are determined from first principles. A series of existing jumping robots are presented and their performance summarized. The authors present two new biologically inspired jumping robots, Jollbot and Glumper, both of which incorporate additional locomotion techniques of rolling and gliding respectively. Jollbot consists of metal hoop springs forming a 300 mm diameter sphere, and when jumping it raises its centre of gravity by 0.22 m and clears a height of 0.18 m. Glumper is of octahedral shape, with four 'legs' that each comprise two 500 mm lengths of CFRP tube articulating around torsion spring 'knees'. It is able to raise its centre of gravity by 1.60 m and clears a height of 1.17 m. The jumping performance of the jumping robot designs presented is discussed and compared against some specialized jumping animals. Specific power output is thought to be the performance-limiting factor for a jumping robot, which requires the maximization of the amount of energy that can be stored together with a minimization of mass. It is demonstrated that this can be achieved through optimization and careful materials selection.
Issue 3 (September 2007)
Received 14 December 2006, accepted for publication 18 May 2007
Published 22 June 2007
A Corrigendum for this article has been published in 2008 Bioinspir. Biomim. 3 039801
Rhodri Armour et al 2007 Bioinspir. Biomim. 2 S65
D Georgieva et al 2011 JINST 6 C01033
W Adam et al 2009 JINST 4 T07001
Kwan-Liu Ma et al 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 78 012088
Avery E Broderick and Abraham Loeb 2006 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 54 448
K Hansen et al 2005 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 4 282
Andreas Ringwald 2006 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 39 197
K Shiiki 2011 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 303 012101
Arno Onken and Klaus Obermayer 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 197 012019
I Grout et al 2005 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 15 244