Article
References
Full text PDF
(34 KB)
Architecture and construction are highly interdisciplinary
fields, integrating many professions and many disciplines on
different levels of scale and complexity. Studies of natural
systems have at all times been inspirational for design.
Investigating the overlaps between biology and architecture we find
that a biological paradigm inspires the current frontier of
research and innovation in many sectors. Using biology's categories
to analyse the field we discover many 'signs of life' in
architecture projects, and many researchers are actively involved
with ways to implement more and more aspects of life into buildings
without calling themselves biomimeticists. Meanwhile the
architectural landscape has adopted biomimetics, bionics,
biologically inspired design or biomimicry as valid strategies.
However, it still lacks a showcase of innovative products or real
breakthrough in the form of a 'really biomimetic building'. This
implies the interpretation of biomimetics as an architectural
style, defining the entirety of a building, best reflected in the
overall form.
Architecture is developed in different layers and has to meet
often contradictory requirements that make information transfer
difficult. Too many possibilities and levels of information are
interconnected to identify simple straightforward questions and
answers. In addition, other challenges have to be met for the
adoption of principles from biology in architecture and there is
still a difficulty in the gathering of information. Finding
phenomena that lend themselves as role models is a challenge for
architects and designers in spite of various attempts at generating
databases and knowledge transfer systems. Whenever designers
stumble across an interesting phenomenon, the relevant information
is often available only in a generic manner or, even worse, limited
to a narrow view angle related to a specific interest. In order to
get hold of transferable information, research from another
perspective in life sciences is needed, so that interdisciplinary
collaboration can provide the platform essential for successful
developments, as illustrated in the present collection of
papers.
In spite of all of the participating research groups working
with a biomimetic focus, the translations and inspirations
discussed in the papers are located mostly on the level of generic
abstract principles, sometimes also referred to as 'deep
principles'. Examples include composite materials aspects,
anisotropy and heterogeneity, when we talk about materials and
systems, and morphological differentiation and adaptation when we
consider form generation processes.
Tom Wiscombe designs visionary buildings that explore the
potentials of architectural surfaces to be shifted from
two-dimensionality to one or three dimensionality by introducing
de-lamination, winding, fusing, blending and embedding of building
systems. The use of non-mineral materials and suggestion of the
logic of healing and weaving are directly taken from biological
material processing. Functionally graded materials and the
introduction of microparticles and biochemical systems shall
further extend the possibilities to create future environments.
Jan Knippers, Thomas Speck and Achim Menges have initiated a
successful interdisciplinary collaboration between architecture,
computational design, engineering and biology. They interpret
architecture and biological evolution as nondeterministic
processes, sharing parallels but fundamental differences at the
same time. Those differences are the basis for the investigation of
new technologies. The ICD/ITKE Research Pavillion 2010 stands as an
example for a homogenous construction using a single textured
material, parametric differentiation and shaping of large elastic
deformations, using digital simulation, planning and production
processes. The development of the so-called Flectofin
® lamellas for shading of facades is based on the
kinematics of the
Strelitzia reginae flower, and again exploits an effect
usually unwelcomed in engineering—torsional
buckling—together with the use of fibre reinforced material.
The introduction of such a system into a large scale building
facade is presented with the thematic pavilion at EXPO 2012 in
Korea, designed and engineered by SOMA Architects, Vienna and
Knippers Helbig Advanced Engineering, Stuttgart, New York. These
large scale implementations of principles derived from nature show
the potential for the application of biomimetics in architectural
design.
Achim Menges' paper is a concise discussion of morphogenetic
computational design, presenting form generation in contrast to the
traditional form definition and form finding strategies in
architectural design. Computational design allows for radically new
approaches in the use, processing and generation of information
that is translated into architectural form via new technologies.
The generative design process is limited by phylogenetic and
physical constraints. According to Menges, the challenge of this
approach lies in resolving the complexity arising from the
interrelation and reciprocal effects of material systems and
dynamic environments. Evolutionary design exploration is introduced
as a method together with a detailed description of case studies
exploring the design of form-performance relations of overall
building morphologies and urban block morphologies.
Taken together, the presented papers show a promising
development towards the implementation of biomimetics in the design
of future built environments.
References
Wiscombe T 2012 Beyond assemblies: systems convergence and
multi-materiality
Bioinspir. Biomim.
7 015001
Knippers J and Speck T 2012 Design and construction principles
in nature and architecture
Bioinspir. Biomim.
7 015002
Menges A 2012 Biomimetic design processes in architecture:
morphogenetic and evolutionary computational design
Bioinspir. Biomim.
7 015003