Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Self-organized natural roads for predicting traffic flow: a sensitivity study

Bin Jiang, Sijian Zhao and Junjun Yin

Show affiliations


Figure 1

Figure 1. A notional road network and its connectivity graphs: (a) segment-based connectivity graph, and road-based connectivity graphs with respect to different join principles of (b) every-best-fit, (c) self-best-fit, and (d) self-fit.



Figure 2

Figure 2. Nationwide road networks in Sweden (a) divided into seven regions (b) and Gävle urban street network (c). (Note: the red spot in (b) is the location of the city Gävle.)



Figure 3

Figure 3. The number of natural roads drops as the threshold angle rises: the case of the entire nationwide road network (a) and Gävle urban street network (b).



Figure 4

Figure 4. Distribution of (a) segment connectivity and (b) road connectivity, whose log–log plot shows a straight line (the inset).



Figure 5

Figure 5. Log–log plots of (a) connectivity, (b) control, (c) betweenness, (d) PageRank (d = 0.20), (e) weighted PageRank (d = 0.20), (f) flow (threshold angle = 45), (g) local integration and (h) global integration.



Figure 6

Figure 6. Log–log plots of (a) connectivity, (b) control, (c) betweenness, (d) PageRank (d = 0.95), (e) weighted PageRank (d = 0.95), (f) flow (threshold angle = 45), (g) local integration and (h) global integration.



Figure 7

Figure 7. Correlation coefficient (R square) between traffic flow and (a) five centrality-based metrics, (b) PageRank and (c) weighted PageRank, with respect to the threshold angle 45, based on the principle of every-best-fit and using the case of the Sydost region. (Note: for both PageRank and weighted PageRank, they have a series of PageRank scores with respect to different damping factor d values.)



Figure 8

Figure 8. Correlation coefficient (R square) between traffic flow and (a) five centrality-based metrics, (b) PageRank and (c) weighted PageRank, with respect to the threshold angle, based on the principle of self-best-fit and using the case of the Sydost region. (Note: for both PageRank and weighted PageRank, they have a series of PageRank scores with respect to different damping factor d values. The curves are the averaged result from 20 experiments.)



Figure 9

Figure 9. Correlation coefficient (R square) between traffic flow and (a) five centrality-based metrics, (b) PageRank and (c) weighted PageRank, with respect to the threshold angle 45, based on the principle of self-fit and using the case of the Sydost region. (Note: for both PageRank and weighted PageRank, they have a series of PageRank scores with respect to different damping factor d values. The curves are the averaged result from 20 experiments.)



Figure 10

Figure 10. Correlation coefficient (R square) between traffic flow and (a) five centrality-based metrics, (b) PageRank and (c) weighted PageRank, with respect to the threshold angle 45, based on the principle of every-best-fit and using the case of the Gävle street network and one day traffic flow. (Note: for both PageRank and weighted PageRank, they have a series of PageRank scores with respect to different damping factor d values.)



Figure 11

Figure 11. Correlation coefficient (R square) between traffic flow and (a) five centrality-based metrics, (b) PageRank and (c) weighted PageRank, with respect to the threshold angle 45, based on the principle of self-best-fit and using the case of the Gävle urban street network and one day traffic. (Note: for both PageRank and weighted PageRank, they have a series of PageRank scores with respect to different damping factor d values. The curves are the averaged result from 20 experiments.)



Figure 12

Figure 12. Correlation coefficient (R square) between traffic flow and (a) five centrality-based metrics, (b) PageRank and (c) weighted PageRank, with respect to the threshold angle, based on the principle of self-fit and using the case of the Gävle urban street network and one day traffic. (Note: for both PageRank and weighted PageRank, they have a series of PageRank scores with respect to different damping factor d values. The curves are the averaged result from 20 experiments.)



Figure 13

Figure 13. Log–log plots of local (a) and global (b) integration using the point-based approach (the case of the entire nationwide road network).



Figure 14

Figure 14. Log–log plots of local (a) and global (b) integration using the point-based approach (the case of the Gävle street network).



Figure 15

Figure 15. Correlation coefficient (R square) between traffic flow and point-based centrality metrics; (a) the case of Sydost and (b) the case of Gävle. (Note: local and global integrations in particular.)



Figure 16

Figure 16. Formation of a natural road (green) in the sequence of (a)–(d) using the principle of self-best-fit.




View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.