Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Topological estimation of percolation thresholds

Richard A Neher1,3, Klaus Mecke2 and Herbert Wagner1

Show affiliations


Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) Black clusters partition the white vertices into an aggregate of complementary clusters. For the square lattice, white vertices are connected by lattice bonds and by diagonal bonds across the faces of the lattice. (b) The black and white clusters of size 1 and 2 on the square lattice. The white perimeter sites of a black cluster are connected (and vice versa).



Figure 2

Figure 2. The MEC of the square lattice (left) and of the triangular lattice (right). Note that p0 is slightly above pc for the square lattice. The triangular lattice is self-matching and pc = p0 = 1/2.



Figure 3

Figure 3. The percolation threshold pc is slightly below the zero crossing p0 of the MEC whenever \pc \gt \frac {1}{2} . This order is reversed, if \pc \lt \frac {1}{2} , as is apparent in the panel on bond percolation. The solution p* of equation (17) provides a very accurate estimate of pc. The deviation |pcp*| exceeds 0.01 only for very open lattices with high percolation thresholds. Lattices are in the order of decreasing percolation threshold. For vertex configurations, numerical values of pc and p* for the 2-uniform lattices; see table 4 in the supplementary material. Numerical estimates of pcsite for the Archimedean lattices are taken from [14]; values for pcbond are from [15, 16].



Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) A lattice face is decorated, when all diagonal connections across the faces have been added to the lattice graph, as illustrated here for three faces of the hexagonal lattice. We consider randomly decorated lattices where each face is decorated with probability pdec. (b) The site percolation threshold pc(pdec) decreases smoothly as the degree of decoration is varied from pdec = 0 to 1. The zero crossing p0(pdec) of χ(p, pdec) provides a tight upper to pc(pdec) if \pc (\pdec)\gt \frac {1}{2} and vice versa. The solution of equation (17), p*(pdec), lies within 0.005 of pc(pdec) with the largest deviations at full or no decoration.



Figure 5

Figure 5. Site percolation on the square lattice: the solution \pestzeta (s_0) of equation (16) approaches pc with increasing s0.



Figure 6

Figure 6. The graphs of the MEC of the simple cubic (sc) and body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice. The bcc lattice has the same black and white connectivities and is hence invariant to the substitution p = 1–p.




View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.