E Ben-Naim et al J. Stat. Mech. (2006) P07001 doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2006/07/P07001
E Ben-Naim1, B Kahng1,2 and J S Kim1,2
Show affiliations
| Figure 1. The stationary distribution of winning rates (12) for the case n = 3, m = 1. |
| Figure 2. The stationary distribution of winning rates (17) for n = 3, m = 2. |
| Figure 3. The stationary distribution of winning rates (26) for the case n = m = 3. |
| Figure 4. The stationary distribution of winning rates Φ(x) for n = 4 (top) and n = 10 (bottom). Monte Carlo simulation results with N = 106 particles at time t = 105 are shown. The circles are the theoretical predictions for the maximal winning rate x0 and the size of the lower tier Φ0. |
| Figure 5. The infinite-n limit. From equation (37), the points (x0, Φ0) all lie on the curve Φ = (x - 1)/x (dashed line). |
E Ben-Naim et al J. Stat. Mech. (2006) P07001
Andrea Montanari and Antoine Sinton J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P08004
I Ispolatov et al J. Stat. Mech. (2006) P09014
F Cheung et al 2004 Phys. Scr. 2004 229
J F Sadoc and J Charvolin 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 465209
Khaled Aljasem et al 2008 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 10 044012
A Sinha and P Roy 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 335306
Sh Farhangfar et al 2009 Nanotechnology 20 325602
Ronald J Tackett et al 2009 Nanotechnology 20 445705
Torsten Böker 2008 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 131 012043