Ariel Tankus et al 2009 J. Neural Eng. 6 056001 doi:10.1088/1741-2560/6/5/056001
Ariel Tankus1, Yehezkel Yeshurun2 and Itzhak Fried1,3,4,5
Show affiliationsWhile automatic spike sorting has been investigated for decades, little attention has been allotted to consistent evaluation criteria that will automatically determine whether a cluster of spikes represents the activity of a single cell or a multiunit. Consequently, the main tool for evaluation has remained visual inspection by a human. This paper quantifies the visual inspection process. The results are well-defined criteria for evaluation, which are mainly based on visual features of the spike waveform, and an automatic adaptive algorithm that learns the classification by a given human and can apply similar visual characteristics for classification of new data. To evaluate the suggested criteria, we recorded the activity of 1652 units (single cells and multiunits) from the cerebrum of 12 human patients undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery requiring implantation of chronic intracranial depth electrodes. The proposed method performed similar to human classifiers and obtained significantly higher accuracy than two existing methods (three variants of each). Evaluation on two synthetic datasets is also provided. The criteria are suggested as a standard for evaluation of the quality of separation that will allow comparison between different studies. The proposed algorithm is suitable for real-time operation and as such may allow brain–computer interfaces to treat single cells differently than multiunits.
87.85.Ng Biological signal processing
87.19.R- Mechanical and electrical properties of tissues and organs
Issue 5 (October 2009)
Received 11 March 2009, accepted for publication 15 July 2009
Published 7 August 2009
Ariel Tankus et al 2009 J. Neural Eng. 6 056001
Luc F. A. Arnold 2005 ApJ 627 534
Chun-Hwey Kim et al. 2003 The Astronomical Journal 126 1555
Il-Han Hwang et al 2006 J. Micromech. Microeng. 16 2475
W Son et al 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 11897
Pedro Tartaj et al 2003 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 R182
L. M. Ziurys and A. J. Apponi 1995 ApJ 455 L73
Guozhen Shen et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 3468
Luo Wei et al 2009 Chinese Phys. Lett. 26 117502
Deon Solomons et al 2006 Class. Quantum Grav. 23 6585