G C McConnell et al 2009 J. Neural Eng. 6 055005 doi:10.1088/1741-2560/6/5/055005
G C McConnell1, R J Butera1,2 and R V Bellamkonda1
Show affiliationsThe widespread adoption of neural prosthetic devices is currently hindered by our inability to reliably record neural signals from chronically implanted electrodes. The extent to which the local tissue response to implanted electrodes influences recording failure is not well understood. To investigate this phenomenon, impedance spectroscopy has shown promise for use as a non-invasive tool to estimate the local tissue response to microelectrodes. Here, we model impedance spectra from chronically implanted rats using the well-established Cole model, and perform a correlation analysis of modeled parameters with histological markers of astroglial scar, including glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) and 4',6-diamidino-2- phenylindole (DAPI). Correlations between modeled parameters and GFAP were significant for three parameters studied: Py value, Ro and |Z|1 kHz, and in all cases were confined to the first 100 µm from the interface. Py value was the only parameter also correlated with DAPI in the first 100 µm. Our experimental results, along with computer simulations, suggest that astrocytes are a predominant cellular player affecting electrical impedance spectra. The results also suggest that the largest contribution from reactive astrocytes on impedance spectra occurs in the first 100 µm from the interface, where electrodes are most likely to record electrical signals. These results form the basis for future approaches where impedance spectroscopy can be used to evaluate neural implants, evaluate strategies to minimize scar and potentially develop closed-loop prosthetic devices.
87.63.Pn Electrical impedance tomography (EIT)
Issue 5 (October 2009)
Received 16 October 2008, accepted for publication 10 March 2009
Published 1 September 2009
G C McConnell et al 2009 J. Neural Eng. 6 055005
Pedro Marronetti et al 2007 Class. Quantum Grav. 24 S43
C Roder et al 2003 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 36 A188
K. L. Luhman et al. 2007 ApJ 659 1629
David N. Esch et al. 2004 ApJ 610 1213
W J Moses et al 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 045005
Karoline M. Gilbert et al. 2009 ApJ 705 1275
M Shane Hutson and Xiaoyan Ma 2008 Phys. Biol. 5 015001
K Makasheva et al 2007 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 49 B233
Kim Sneppen et al 2009 Phys. Biol. 6 036005