Paula Stice and Jit Muthuswamy 2009 J. Neural Eng. 6 046004 doi:10.1088/1741-2560/6/4/046004
Paula Stice1 and Jit Muthuswamy1,2
Show affiliationsRepositioning microelectrodes post-implantation is emerging as a promising approach to achieve long-term reliability in single neuronal recordings. The main goal of this study was to (a) assess glial reaction in response to movement of microelectrodes in the brain post-implantation and (b) determine an optimal window of time post-implantation when movement of microelectrodes within the brain would result in minimal glial reaction. Eleven Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with two microelectrodes each that could be moved in vivo post-implantation. Three cohorts were investigated: (1) microelectrode moved at day 2 (n = 4 animals), (2) microelectrode moved at day 14 (n = 5 animals) and (3) microelectrode moved at day 28 (n = 2 animals). Histological evaluation was performed in cohorts 1–3 at four-week post-movement (30 days, 42 days and 56 days post-implantation, respectively). In addition, five control animals were implanted with microelectrodes that were not moved. Control animals were implanted for (1) 30 days (n = 1), (2) 42 days (n = 2) and (3) 56 days (n = 2) prior to histological evaluation. Quantitative assessment of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) around the tip of the microelectrodes demonstrated that GFAP levels were similar around microelectrodes moved at day 2 when compared to the 30-day controls. However, GFAP expression levels around microelectrode tips that moved at day 14 and day 28 were significantly less than those around control microelectrodes implanted for 42 and 56 days, respectively. Therefore, we conclude that moving microelectrodes after implantation is a viable strategy that does not result in any additional damage to brain tissue. Further, moving the microelectrode downwards after 14 days of implantation may actually reduce the levels of GFAP expression around the tips of the microelectrodes in the long term.
87.80.-y Biophysical techniques (research methods)
87.19.R- Mechanical and electrical properties of tissues and organs
Issue 4 (August 2009)
Received 31 December 2008, accepted for publication 29 May 2009
Published 25 June 2009
Paula Stice and Jit Muthuswamy 2009 J. Neural Eng. 6 046004
Song Cao and Shi-Jie Chen 2008 Phys. Biol. 5 016002
Comron Nouri et al 2008 Phys. Biol. 5 015006
R. K. Honeycutt and J. W. Robertson 1998 The Astronomical Journal 116 1961
J. C. Pandey et al. 2005 The Astronomical Journal 130 1231
Richard A. Carrigan Jr 2009 ApJ 698 2075
Jan-Uwe Ness et al. 2003 ApJ 598 1277
Nuria Calvet et al. 2004 The Astronomical Journal 128 1294
Eric D. Feigelson et al. 2003 ApJ 599 1207
J. Fraxedas et al 2007 EPL 78 16001