M S Baig-Silva et al 2005 J. Neural Eng. 2 S29 doi:10.1088/1741-2560/2/1/005
M S Baig-Silva1, C D Hathcock1 and J R Hetling1,2
Show affiliationsA remaining challenge to the development of electronic prostheses for vision is improving the effectiveness of retinal stimulation. Electrode design and stimulus parameters need to be optimized such that the neural output from the retina conveys information to the mind's eye that aids the patient in interpreting his or her environment. This optimization will require a detailed understanding of the response of the retina to electrical stimulation. The identity and response characteristics of the cellular targets of stimulation need to be defined and evaluated. Described here is an in vivo preparation for studying electrical stimulation of the retina in rat at the cellular level. The use of rat makes available a number of well-described models of retinal disease that motivate prosthesis development. Artificial stimulation can be investigated by adapting techniques traditionally employed to study the response of the retina to photic stimuli, such as recording at the cornea, single-cell recording, and pharmacological dissection of the response. Pilot studies include amplitude–intensity response data for subretinal and transretinal stimulation paradigms recorded in wild-type rats and a transgenic rat model of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. The ability to record single-unit ganglion cell activity in vivo is also demonstrated.
87.80.-y Biophysical techniques (research methods)
42.66.Ew Physiology of eye; optic-nerve structure and function
87.19.R- Mechanical and electrical properties of tissues and organs
Instrumentation and measurement
Issue 1 (March 2005)
Received 20 October 2004, accepted for publication 10 January 2005
Published 22 February 2005
M S Baig-Silva et al 2005 J. Neural Eng. 2 S29
J Baudon et al 1970 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 3 207
A F Dufton 1931 J. Sci. Instrum. 8 159
H. Linke et al 1999 Europhys. Lett. 45 406
Jie Yang et al 2008 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 21 082001
C A Mayhew and J P Connerade 1986 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 19 3505
Joachim Brand and William P Reinhardt 2001 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34 L113
A Bhouri et al 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 7017
Joachim Brand 2004 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 37 S287
M Jaros 1972 J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 5 1985