Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

HOW MASSIVE ARE MASSIVE COMPACT GALAXIES?

FREE ISSUE

Adam Muzzin1, Pieter van Dokkum1, Marijn Franx2, Danilo Marchesini1,3, Mariska Kriek4 and Ivo Labbé5,6

Show affiliations


Using a sample of nine massive compact galaxies at z~ 2.3 with rest-frame optical spectroscopy and comprehensive U → 8 μm photometry, we investigate how assumptions in spectral energy distribution (SED) modeling change the stellar mass estimates of these galaxies, and how this affects our interpretation of their size evolution. The SEDs are fitted to τ-models with a range of metallicities, dust laws, and different stellar population synthesis codes. These models indicate masses equal to, or slightly smaller than, our default masses. The maximum difference is 0.16 dex for each parameter considered, and only 0.18 dex for the most extreme combination of parameters. Two-component populations with a maximally old stellar population superposed with a young component provide reasonable fits to these SEDs using the models of Bruzual & Charlot; however, when using models with updated treatment of TP-AGB stars, the fits are poorer. The two-component models predict masses that are 0.08-0.22 dex larger than the τ-models. We also test the effect of a bottom-light initial mass function (IMF) and find that it would reduce the masses of these galaxies by 0.3 dex. Considering the range of allowable masses from the τ-models, two-component fits, and IMF, we conclude that on average these galaxies lie below the mass-size relation of galaxies in the local universe by a factor of 3-9, depending on the SED models used.


Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: stellar content; infrared: galaxies


PACS

98.62.Ck Masses and mass distribution

95.75.Fg Spectroscopy and spectrophotometry

98.62.Lv Stellar content and populations; radii; morphology and overall structure

98.62.Py Distances, redshifts, radial velocities; spatial distribution of galaxies

95.75.De Photography and photometry (including microlensing techniques)

Subjects

Astrophysics and astroparticles

Dates

Issue 1 (2009 November 20)

Received 2009 August 10, accepted for publication 2009 September 25

Published 2009 November 6



Related review articles

What's this?
View review articles related to this research to gain an insight into the key trends in this subject area. Related review articles are selected based on PACS/MSC codes, and are no more than three years old.

  1. Magnetohydrodynamic models of astrophysical jets
  2. Gravitational lensing
  3. Physical conditions in potential accelerators of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays: updated Hillas plot and radiation-loss constraints
More

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.