F. J. Martínez-Serrano et al 2009 ApJ 705 L133 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/L133
F. J. Martínez-Serrano1, A. Serna1, M. Doménech-Moral1 and R. Domínguez-Tenreiro2
Show affiliationsWe present smoothed particle hydrodynamics cosmological simulations of the formation of three disk galaxies with a detailed treatment of chemical evolution and cooling. The resulting galaxies have properties compatible with observations: relatively high disk-to-total ratios, thin stellar disks, and good agreement with the Tully-Fisher and the luminosity-size relations. They present a break in the luminosity profile at 3.0 ± 0.5 disk scale lengths while showing an exponential mass profile without any apparent breaks, which is in line with recent observational results. Since the stellar mass profile is exponential, only differences in the stellar populations can be the cause of the luminosity break. Although we find a cutoff for the star formation rate (SFR) imposed by a density threshold in our star formation model, it does not coincide with the luminosity break and is located at 4.3 ± 0.4 disk scale lengths, with star formation going on between both radii. The color profiles and the age profiles are "U-shaped," with the minimum for both profiles located approximately at the break radius. The SFR to stellar mass ratio increases until the break, explaining the coincidence of the break with the minimum of the age profile. Beyond the break, we find a steep decline in the gas density and, consequently, a decline in the SFR and redder colors. We show that most stars (64%-78%) in the outer disk originate in the inner disk and afterward migrate there. Such stellar migrations are likely the main origin of the U-shaped age profile and, therefore, of the luminosity break.
galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: stellar content; methods: N-body simulations
98.62.Hr Spiral arms and bars; galactic disks
98.62.Ai Origin, formation, evolution, age, and star formation
98.62.Lv Stellar content and populations; radii; morphology and overall structure
Issue 2 (2009 November 10)
Received 2009 June 5, accepted for publication 2009 September 29
Published 2009 October 21
F. J. Martínez-Serrano et al 2009 ApJ 705 L133
M A Hakulinen et al 2003 Phys. Med. Biol. 48 1741
P. Tanga et al 2009 ApJ 706 L197
M Perry et al 2009 Bioinspir. Biomim. 4 044001
Daniel M White et al 2007 Environ. Res. Lett. 2 045018
C. E. DeForest and J. B. Gurman 1998 ApJ 501 L217
Shinji Koide 2009 ApJ 701 2033
I M Dharmadasa et al 2002 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 17 1238
R. K. Barry et al. 2008 ApJ 677 1253
David B Lobell and Marshall B Burke 2008 Environ. Res. Lett. 3 034007