Connecting Substructure in Galaxy Cluster Cores at z = 0.2 with Cluster Assembly Histories

and

Published 2008 July 8 © 2008. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.
, , Citation Graham P. Smith and James E. Taylor 2008 ApJ 682 L73 DOI 10.1086/591271

1538-4357/682/2/L73

Abstract

We use semianalytic models of structure formation to interpret gravitational lensing measurements of substructure in galaxy cluster cores (R ⩽ 250 h−1 kpc) at z = 0.2. The dynamic range of the lensing-based substructure fraction measurements is well matched to the theoretical predictions, both spanning fsub ∼ 0.05–0.65. The structure formation model predicts that fsub is correlated with cluster assembly history. We use simple fitting formulae to parameterize the predicted correlations: Δ90 = τ90 + α90log (fsub) and Δ50 = τ50 + α50log (fsub) , where Δ90 and Δ50 are the predicted lookback times from z = 0.2 to when each theoretical cluster had acquired 90% and 50%, respectively, of the mass it had at z = 0.2. The best-fit parameter values are α90 = − 1.34 ± 0.79 Gyr , τ90 = 0.31 ± 0.56 Gyr and α50 = − 2.77 ± 1.66 Gyr , τ50 = 0.99 ± 1.18 Gyr . Therefore, (1) observed clusters with fsub≲ 0.1 (e.g., A383, A1835) are interpreted, on average, to have formed at z≳ 0.8 and to have suffered ≤10% mass growth since z≃ 0.4, and (2) observed clusters with fsub≳ 0.4 (e.g., A68, A773) are interpreted as, on average, forming since z≃ 0.4 and suffering >10% mass growth in the ~500 Myr preceding z = 0.2, i.e., since z = 0.25. In summary, observational measurements of fsub can be combined with structure formation models to estimate the age and assembly history of observed clusters. The ability to "age date" approximately clusters in this way has numerous applications to the large samples of clusters that are becoming available.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1086/591271