Jeffrey A. Newman and Marc Davis 2000 ApJ 534 L11 doi:10.1086/312657
Jeffrey A. Newman1 and Marc Davis1,2
Show affiliationsThe classical dN/dz test allows one to determine fundamental cosmological parameters from the evolution of the cosmic volume element. This test is applied by measuring the redshift distribution of a tracer whose evolution in number density is known. In the past, ordinary galaxies have been used for this; however, in the absence of a complete theory of galaxy formation, that method is fraught with difficulties. In this Letter, we propose studying instead the evolution of the apparent numbers of dark matter halos as a function of their circular velocity, observable via the line widths or rotation speeds of visible galaxies. Upcoming redshift surveys will allow the line width distribution of galaxies to be determined at both z ~ 1 and the present day. In the course of studying this test, we have devised a rapid, improved semianalytic method for calculating the circular velocity distribution of dark halos based on the analytic mass function of Sheth, Mo, & Tormen and the formation time distribution of Lacey & Cole. We find that if selection effects are well controlled and minimal external constraints are applied, the planned DEEP Redshift Survey could allow us to measure the cosmic equation-of-state parameter w to ±10% (as little as 3% if Ωm has been well determined from other observations). This type of test also has the potential to provide a constraint on any evolution of w, such as that predicted by "tracker" models.
cosmology: miscellaneous; cosmology: observations; cosmology: theory; dark matter; galaxies: fundamental parameters
Issue 1 (2000 May 1)
Received 1999 December 17, accepted for publication 2000 March 14
Published 2000 April 27
Jeffrey A. Newman and Marc Davis 2000 ApJ 534 L11
William R. Ward 1997 ApJ 482 L211
Burkhard Fuchs and Christian Dettbarn 2011 The Astronomical Journal 141 5
S. Roeser et al. 2010 The Astronomical Journal 139 2440
Eric W. Greisen et al. 2009 The Astronomical Journal 137 4718
B. A. Whitney et al. 2008 The Astronomical Journal 136 18
Jonathan T. Barron et al. 2008 The Astronomical Journal 135 414
E. S. Voges et al. 2008 The Astronomical Journal 135 1291
Michael R. Blanton and Sam Roweis 2007 The Astronomical Journal 133 734
H L Callendar 1910 Proc. Phys. Soc. London 23 153