Izumi Hachisu et al 2000 ApJ 528 L97 doi:10.1086/312428
Izumi Hachisu1, Mariko Kato2, Taichi Kato3 and Katsura Matsumoto3
Show affiliationsA theoretical light curve for the 1999 outburst of U Scorpii is presented in order to obtain various physical parameters of the recurrent nova. Our U Sco model consists of a very massive white dwarf (WD) with an accretion disk and a lobe-filling, slightly evolved, main-sequence star (MS). The model includes a reflection effect by the companion and the accretion disk together with a shadowing effect on the companion by the accretion disk. The early visual light curve (with a linear phase of t ~ 1-15 days after maximum) is well reproduced by a thermonuclear runaway model on a very massive WD close to the Chandrasekhar limit (MWD = 1.37 ± 0.01 M
), in which optically thick winds blowing from the WD play a key role in determining the nova duration. The ensuing plateau phase (t ~ 15-30 days) is also reproduced by the combination of a slightly irradiated MS and a fully irradiated flaring-up disk with a radius ~1.4 times the Roche lobe size. The cooling phase (t ~ 30-40 days) is consistent with a low-hydrogen content of X ≈ 0.05 of the envelope for the 1.37 M
WD. The best-fit parameters are the WD mass of MWD ~ 1.37 M
, the companion mass of MMS ~ 1.5 M
(0.8-2.0 M
is acceptable), the inclination angle of the orbit (i ~ 80°), and the flaring-up edge, the vertical height of which is ~0.30 times the accretion disk radius. The duration of the strong wind phase (t ~ 0-17 days) is very consistent with the BeppoSAX supersoft X-ray detection at t ~ 19-20 days because supersoft X-rays are self-absorbed by the massive wind. The envelope mass at the peak is estimated to be ~3 × 10-6 M
, which is indicates an average mass accretion rate of ~2.5 × 10-7 M
yr-1 during the quiescent phase between 1987 and 1999. These quantities are exactly the same as those predicted in a new progenitor model of Type Ia supernovae.
accretion, accretion disks; binaries: close; novae, cataclysmic variables; stars: individual (U Scorpii)
Issue 2 (2000 January 10)
Received 1999 June 21, accepted for publication 1999 November 12
Published 1999 December 8
Izumi Hachisu et al 2000 ApJ 528 L97
Gregory Boverman et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 3941
B Sriram Shastry 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 L431
T Humer-Hager et al 1986 J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 19 2153
Markus J Buehler 2007 Nanotechnology 18 295102
A Bandyopadhyay et al 2004 Nanotechnology 15 1603
J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash 2001 ApJ 550 426
Parongama Sen and Somendra M Bhattacharjee 2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 L141
Marek Szydłowski and Andrzej J Maciejewski 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 3501
M Gitterman 2001 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 10119