THE FIRST MULTI-COLOR PHOTOMETRIC STUDY OF THE NEAR-CONTACT BINARY AS SERPENTIS

, , and

Published 2008 June 11 © 2008. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation L.-Y. Zhu et al 2008 AJ 136 337 DOI 10.1088/0004-6256/136/1/337

1538-3881/136/1/337

ABSTRACT

The first complete multi-color CCD photometric light curves of the eclipsing binary AS Ser were obtained over three nights in 2005. Using the latest Wilson–Devinney (WD) code, we computed the photometric elements of this system. It turns out that AS Ser is a near-contact binary system with both components filling more than 99% of their Roche lobes. It belongs to a marginal contact binary system within the parameter uncertainties. The marginal characteristic of AS Ser reveals that this target may be in a rare phase predicted by the thermal relaxation oscillation (TRO) theory. The asymmetry of the light curves can be explained by a dark spot on the secondary component, which is consistent with its late-type nature. Combining all available times of light minimum, we derived a new orbital period of AS Ser and found a periodic oscillation varying within an amplitude of 0.0049 days and a period of 11.8 years. This period change may be the result of the light-time effect due to a presumed tertiary component (M3 > 0.28M) or might result from magnetic activity cycles of the two components.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

Near-contact binaries (NCBs) have been defined by Shaw (1994) as systems with periods of less than one day, showing tide interaction and facing surface less than 0.1 orbital radius apart. This subclass of close binaries is interesting due to its marginal characteristic. They can be intermediate objects between the stage of detached or semi-detached binary systems and that of contact binary systems. In the 4th edition of the General Catalogue of Variable Stars (GCVS) (Kholopov et al. 1987), AS Ser is classified as a short-period EB-type eclipsing binary system of the F2 spectral class. It was also listed in the table of Shaw (1994) as a near-contact system. We thus list it as one of our observed targets to study near-contact binaries.

The light variation of the eclipsing binary system AS Ser was discovered by Hoffmeister (1935). Since then, neither complete light curves nor spectroscopic data for this system have been published in the literature; only some times of light minimum are available. In 2005 and in 2008, we observed this neglected system and obtained complete CCD light curves in the B, V, and R bands, with the 1.0 m Cassegrain reflecting telescope at the Yunnan Observatory in China. In order to understand the geometrical structure and evolutionary state of this eclipsing binary system, the light curves are analyzed with the Wilson–Devinney (WD) synthetic method. Combining the photometric solutions with the period change, the structure and the probable evolutionary state of AS Ser are discussed.

2. OBSERVATIONS

AS Ser (α2000 = 15:38:49.01; δ2000 = 02:15:30.5) was observed in the B, V, and R bands on 2005 April 9, 23, and May 4 with the PI1024 TKB CCD photometric system attached to the 1.0 m Cassegrain reflecting telescope at the Yunnan Observatory in China. Its effective field of view at the Cassegrain focus was about 6.5 × 6.5 arcmin2. During the observation, the integration time for each image was 120 s and B, V, and R filters close to the Johnson UBVRI system were used (Yang & Li 1999). Image reductions were done using the IRAF package, and the observed data in three bands are listed in Tables 13 and plotted in Figure 1. Comparison (α2000 = 15:38:41.35, δ2000 = 02:13:56.9) and check stars (α2000 = 15:38:51.98, δ2000 = 02:13:53.1) were chosen near the target. As one can see from Figure 1, AS Ser displays total eclipses. The shape of its light curve is typically a β Lyr type with an unequal height at two maxima (maximum II slightly brighter than maximum I), i.e., the O'Connell effect. Furthermore, a deeper minimum II in the R band than in the other two bands can be clearly seen in Figure 1. All these characteristics imply that this system has a strong tidal interaction and its secondary component may be a late-type star due to its radiation concentrating on longer wavebands. The differences in the light levels in the three bands are shown in Table 4. To investigate the period variation of this target, we again observed it using the same photometric system and telescope on 2008 January 4 and obtained an R-band light epoch of 2454,470.4391(±0.0002).

Figure 1.

Figure 1. The observed BVR light curves of AS Ser.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 1. B-Band CCD Observations of AS Ser

JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m) JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m) JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m) JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m) JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m) JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m)
74.1427 1.305 74.1482 1.234 74.1536 1.203 74.1590 1.194 74.1644 1.145 74.1698 1.144
74.1752 1.124 74.1804 1.106 74.1859 1.094 74.1913 1.072 74.1968 1.058 74.2023 1.067
74.2077 1.071 74.2131 1.057 74.2185 1.046 74.2242 1.065 74.2296 1.076 74.2350 1.068
74.2404 1.081 74.2458 1.095 74.2511 1.106 74.2564 1.117 74.2620 1.121 74.2674 1.137
74.2730 1.141 74.2784 1.146 74.2839 1.159 74.2893 1.177 74.2947 1.195 74.3000 1.206
74.3055 1.206 95.2805 1.182 95.2860 1.197 95.2916 1.199 95.2971 1.214 95.3028 1.223
95.3084 1.219 95.3141 1.217 95.3198 1.217 95.3255 1.218 95.3314 1.218 95.3370 1.202
95.3427 1.197 95.3483 1.191 70.1652 1.214 70.1707 1.204 70.1764 1.192 70.1819 1.179
70.1876 1.165 70.1931 1.153 70.1985 1.153 70.2040 1.141 70.2094 1.132 70.2149 1.126
70.2203 1.113 70.2257 1.110 70.2310 1.105 70.2364 1.092 70.2418 1.098 70.2472 1.094
70.2525 1.098 70.2579 1.083 70.2633 1.098 70.2686 1.095 70.2761 1.115 70.2816 1.118
70.2871 1.115 70.2928 1.156 70.2983 1.172 70.3038 1.174 70.3093 1.203 70.3148 1.241
70.3202 1.271 70.3257 1.328 70.3313 1.389 70.3368 1.441 70.3423 1.531 70.3479 1.633
70.3535 1.708 70.3592 1.709 70.3649 1.748 70.3761 1.729 70.3817 1.694 70.3873 1.610
70.3928 1.528 70.3985 1.441 70.4040 1.377 70.4096 1.319 70.4152 1.251 70.4208 1.219
70.4264 1.174                    

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 2. V-Band CCD Observations of AS Ser

JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m) JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m) JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m) JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m) JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m) JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m)
74.1445 1.277 74.1500 1.255 74.1554 1.236 74.1608 1.204 74.1662 1.187 74.1716 1.190
74.1770 1.148 74.1823 1.143 74.1877 1.142 74.1931 1.119 74.1986 1.120 74.2040 1.123
74.2094 1.112 74.2149 1.114 74.2203 1.127 74.2260 1.123 74.2314 1.121 74.2368 1.135
74.2422 1.135 74.2476 1.151 74.2529 1.151 74.2583 1.158 74.2638 1.162 74.2692 1.180
74.2748 1.192 74.2802 1.209 74.2857 1.215 74.2911 1.235 74.2964 1.243 74.3018 1.258
74.3127 1.268 74.3181 1.280 95.2823 1.263 95.2879 1.273 95.2934 1.281 95.2991 1.285
95.3047 1.289 95.3102 1.279 95.3161 1.277 95.3217 1.280 95.3274 1.275 95.3333 1.275
95.3390 1.256 95.3446 1.242 70.1449 1.293 70.1504 1.290 70.1558 1.281 70.1613 1.280
70.1670 1.265 70.1726 1.254 70.1782 1.242 70.1838 1.227 70.1894 1.203 70.1948 1.207
70.2003 1.177 70.2058 1.180 70.2112 1.177 70.2167 1.157 70.2221 1.148 70.2274 1.153
70.2327 1.142 70.2381 1.137 70.2436 1.131 70.2489 1.133 70.2543 1.138 70.2597 1.122
70.2650 1.140 70.2703 1.141 70.2779 1.156 70.2834 1.161 70.2891 1.179 70.2946 1.188
70.3001 1.204 70.3057 1.230 70.3111 1.253 70.3166 1.286 70.3220 1.331 70.3276 1.376
70.3331 1.427 70.3386 1.506 70.3441 1.573 70.3497 1.672 70.3554 1.724 70.3611 1.738
70.3667 1.747 70.3723 1.732 70.3780 1.726 70.3835 1.698 70.3891 1.614 70.3946 1.511
70.4003 1.438 70.4059 1.363 70.4114 1.307 70.4170 1.260 70.4226 1.224    

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 3. R-Band CCD Observations of AS Ser

JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m) JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m) JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m) JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m) JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m) JD (Hel.) +2453400 Δ(m)
74.1463 1.339 74.1518 1.304 74.1572 1.280 74.1626 1.272 74.1680 1.253 74.1734 1.231
74.1787 1.226 74.1841 1.212 74.1895 1.191 74.1949 1.186 74.2004 1.187 74.2059 1.178
74.2113 1.173 74.2167 1.178 74.2221 1.168 74.2278 1.182 74.2332 1.182 74.2386 1.189
74.2440 1.195 74.2494 1.209 74.2547 1.215 74.2602 1.228 74.2656 1.227 74.2711 1.236
74.2766 1.255 74.2821 1.265 74.2875 1.289 74.2928 1.306 74.2982 1.326 74.3037 1.349
74.3090 1.352 95.2842 1.346 95.2898 1.364 95.2953 1.380 95.3009 1.371 95.3065 1.385
95.3122 1.378 95.3180 1.375 95.3236 1.375 95.3293 1.364 95.3352 1.361 95.3409 1.341
95.3464 1.322 70.1576 1.373 70.1632 1.348 70.1688 1.331 70.1745 1.316 70.1801 1.302
70.1857 1.280 70.1912 1.265 70.1967 1.254 70.2021 1.244 70.2076 1.233 70.2130 1.226
70.2185 1.215 70.2239 1.209 70.2292 1.200 70.2345 1.190 70.2399 1.194 70.2454 1.189
70.2507 1.193 70.2561 1.192 70.2615 1.195 70.2668 1.205 70.2721 1.213 70.2797 1.226
70.2852 1.229 70.2909 1.246 70.2964 1.254 70.3019 1.269 70.3075 1.292 70.3129 1.312
70.3184 1.354 70.3239 1.388 70.3294 1.436 70.3350 1.506 70.3405 1.574 70.3459 1.641
70.3516 1.713 70.3572 1.746 70.3629 1.756 70.3742 1.753 70.3799 1.738 70.3854 1.691
70.3909 1.639 70.3966 1.551 70.4021 1.475 70.4077 1.418 70.4133 1.363 70.4188 1.321
70.4244 1.289 70.4302 1.264 70.4356 1.251            

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 4. The Differences in Light Levels in the Light Curves of AS Ser

  ΔB ΔV ΔR
Max. I−Max. II(m0.25m0.75) −0fm 036 −0fm 016 −0fm 016
Min. I−Min. II(m0.0m0.5) 0.509 0.425 0.367
Min. I−Max. I 0.670 0.589 0.566
Min. II−Max. II 0.125 0.149 0.183

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

3. ORBITAL PERIOD STUDY OF AS SER

The times of light minimum of AS Ser have been compiled by Kreiner et al. (2000) and some of them, published in Beobachter der Schweizerischen Astronomischen Gesellschaft (BBSAG) Bulletins, have been collected at the Eclipsing Minimum Database (available at http://nac.oa.uj.pl/ktt/ktt.html). Recently, six new photoelectric and CCD observations were obtained by Agerer & Hüebscher (2002), Nelson (2005), Dvorak (2006), and ourselves. All available photographic (ph), visual (v), photoelectric (pe), and CCD minima times are listed in Table 5. With the following ephemeris given by Kreiner et al. (2000):

Equation (1)

the OC values for those times are computed and listed in Columns 5 and 12 of Table 5. The corresponding OC curve is plotted in the upper panel of Figure 2, where the open circles stand for photographic and visual observational data and the dots for photoelectric and CCD observations.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. The upper panel represents the (OC) diagram of AS Ser and the bottom panel gives the residuals of linear fitting. The open circles represent minimum times determined from visual and photometric observations and the dots from photoelectric and CCD observations.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 5. Times of Light Minimum for AS Ser

JD (Hel.) 2400000+ Min. Meth. E (O–C) Residuals Reference JD (Hel.) 240000+ Min. Meth. E (O–C) Residuals Reference
28333.323 I v −51834 −0.0435 −0.00636 (1) 48385.402 II v −8825.5 0.0148 0.01929 (6)
28333.331 I v −51834 −0.0355 0.00163 (1) 48406.396 II v −8780.5 0.0283 0.03276 (6)
28334.252 I v −51832 −0.0470 −0.00986 (1) 48440.410 II v −8707.5 0.0072 0.0116 (6)
28335.193 I v −51830 −0.0385 −0.00136 (1) 48761.410 I v −8019 0.0051 0.00898 (7)
28339.397 I v −51821 −0.0306 0.00652 (1) 48768.425 I v −8004 0.0266 0.03047 (7)
28347.303 I v −51804 −0.0505 −0.01338 (1) 48795.447 I v −7946 0.0071 0.01093 (7)
28574.215 II v −51317.5 0.0387   (1) 48802.442 I v −7931 0.0086 0.01241 (7)
29024.283 I v −50352 −0.0422 −0.00618 (1) 48823.409 I v −7886 −0.005 −0.00121 (7)
29038.291 I v −50322 −0.0212 0.01479 (1) 48837.389 I v −7856 −0.012 −0.00823 (8)
29039.206 I v −50320 −0.0387 −0.00271 (1) 49158.411 II v −7167.5 0.008 0.01123 (9)
29045.253 I v −50307 −0.0527 −0.01672 (1) 49520.434 I v −6391 0.0004 0.00305 (10)
30515.779 I p −47153 −0.0284 0.00518 (1) 49534.429 I v −6361 0.0083 0.01092 (10)
34920.751 I p −37705 −0.0343 −0.00788 (1) 49544.416 II v −6339.5 −0.0287 −0.02608 (10)
42937.428 II v −20510.5 −0.0161 −0.00273 (2) 49569.374 I v −6286 −0.0142 −0.01162 (10)
46177.532 I v −13561 −0.0046 0.00349 (1) 50587.406 II CCD −4102.5 −0.0039 −0.00298 (11)
47363.410 II v −11017.5 0.0075 0.01366 (3) 50949.4403 I CCD −3326 −0.0002 0.00012 (12)
48013.362 II v −9623.5 0.0294 0.03450 (4) 51660.4476 I pe −1801 0.0004 −0.00043 (13)
48015.442 I v −9619 0.0114 0.01650 (4) 52001.5060 II CCD −1069.5 0.0087 0.00731 (1)
48042.459 I v −9561 −0.0132 −0.00814 (4) 53143.7715 II CCD 1380.5 0.0011 −0.00214 (14)
48084.422 I v −9471 −0.0112 −0.00621 (5) 53470.3669 I CCD 2081 −0.0003 −0.00407 (15)
48088.405 II v −9462.5 0.0088 0.01378 (5) 53495.3106 II CCD 2134.5 −0.0002 −0.00401 (15)
48091.409 I v −9456 −0.0177 −0.01272 (5) 53503.7034 II CCD 2152.5 0.0004 −0.00343 (16)
              54470.4391 I CCD 4226 0.0001 −0.0053 (15)

Note. The cycles E and the OC values are calculated with Equation (1). The residuals are based on the linear fit of Equation (2). References. (1) J. M. Kreiner (private communication), (2) Diethelm (1976), (3) Peter (1988); (4) Peter (1990a), (5) Peter (1990b), (6) Peter (1991), (7) Peter (1992a), (8) Peter (1992b), (9) Peter (1993), (10) Peter & Diethelm (1994), (11) Diethelm (1997), (12) Diethelm (1998), (13) Agerer & Hüebscher (2002), (14) Nelson (2005), (15) this paper, (16) Dvorak (2006).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

We take a weight of 1 for photographic and visual observational data and 8 for the photoelectric and CCD observational data. Then, by means of the least-squares method, the following ephemeris is obtained:

Equation (2)

which gives a more precise period and can be used to predict the epochs of light minimum. The linear fitting curve (dashed line) is plotted in the upper panel of Figure 2 and the residuals (which are listed in Columns 6 and 13 of Table 5) of this fit are shown in the bottom panel. From the bottom panel, one can see that the photoelectric and CCD residuals display a trend of period variation. Thus, we fit these residuals with the least-squares method and derive the following equation:

Equation (3)

The sinusoidal term reveals that a periodic oscillation with an amplitude of 0.0049  days and a period of 11.8  years may exist. The corresponding fitting curve is shown in the bottom panel of Figure 2.

4. PHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS WITH THE WD METHOD

CCD observations, 91 in the B band, 95 in the V band, and 93 in the R band for AS Ser, are analyzed with the latest version of the WD program (Wilson & Devinney 1971; Wilson 1979, 1990, 1994; Wilson & Van Hamme 2003).

According to the spectral type of F2 for AS Ser (from GCVS, Kholopov et al. 1987), we assume an effective temperature of T1 = 7 000 K for the primary component (the star eclipsed at primary minimum). The gravity-darkening coefficients g1 = g2 = 0.32 (Lucy 1967) and the bolometric albedo A1 = A2 = 0.5 are used, corresponding to the convective envelope of this binary system. Bolometric and bandpass square-root limb-darkening parameters are taken from the table of Van Hamme (1993). The adjustable parameters are the inclination, i, the mean temperature of star 2, T2, the monochromatic luminosities of star 1, L1B, L1V, and L1R, and the dimensionless potentials of star 1 and star 2, Ω1 and Ω2.

To get a reliable mass ratio, q, the solutions for several assumed values of the mass ratio q (q = 0.25, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6) are obtained. For each q, the calculation starts at mode 2 (the detached mode). The sums of weighted square deviations ΣWi(OC)2i for all the assumed values of q are shown in the upper panel of Figure 3. There is a nearly flat segment on the bottom from q = 0.3–0.35, which makes it difficult to find a proper q. We thus add the inclination, i, as a second dimension for the search. For several fixed i (i = 80°, 81°, 82°, 83°, 84°, 85°, 86°, 87°, 89°, 90°, which correspond to the total eclipse of AS Ser), the minimum Σ is achieved at q = 0.31 and i = 86°, which can be clearly seen in the lower panel of Figure 3. Therefore, we perform a differential correction so that it converges by choosing q = 0.31 and i = 86° as the initial values and by making q and i adjustable parameters. We find that it could converge to either of mode 4 (semi-detached mode with lobe filling primary, SD1) and mode 5 (semi-detached mode with lobe filling secondary, SD2). Actually, the two components reached their critical Roche lobes with the uncertainties of Ω1 (Columns 3 and 4) and Ω2 (Column 2) taken into account. This implies the marginal characteristic of AS Ser. The derived photometric parameters are listed in Table 6. In Table 6, Column 3 is the parameters with the minimum value of Σ without a spot; we will take them as our final solutions for further calculations. The solid lines in Figure 4 show the theoretical light curves computed with the parameters of Column 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. The upper panel is the Σ − q curve for AS Ser and the bottom panel is the Σ − i curves with different q.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.

Figure 4. The theoretical light curves (without l3) and configuration of AS Ser with a cool spot on the secondary component.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 6. Photometric Solutions for AS Ser

Parameter Without l3 With l3
  Unspotted Spotted Unspotted Spotted
Model* SD1 SD2 SD2 C C
g1 = g2 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32
A1 = A2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
i (deg) 86.21(94) 86.12(63) 86.88(88) 89.64(2.34) 89.80(1.64)
T1 (K) 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000
T2 (K) 4 545(34) 4 565(37) 4 634(30) 4 572(32) 4 642(28)
q 0.319(7) 0.311(3) 0.312(2) 0.344(6) 0.354(2)
Ωin 2.5078 2.4900 2.4926 2.5622 2.5825
Ω1 2.5078 2.4950(67) 2.4984(53) 2.5566(125) 2.5643(55)
Ω2 2.5218(292) 2.4900 2.4926 2.5566 2.5643
(L1B)/(L1B + L2B) 0.9815(1) 0.9805(1) 0.9780(1)    
(L1V)/(L1V + L2V) 0.9646(1) 0.9630(1) 0.9592(1)    
(L1R)/(L1R + L2R) 0.9488(1) 0.9469(1) 0.9427(1)    
(L1B)/(L1B + L2B + L3B)       0.9747(12) 0.9696(6)
(L1V)/(L1V + L2V + L3V)       0.9564(11) 0.9469(7)
(L1R)/(L1R + L2R + L3R)       0.9353(12) 0.9277(8)
(L3B)/(L1B + L2B + L3B)       0.0039(12) 0.0055(6)
(L3V)/(L1V + L2V + L3V)       0.0055(9) 0.0073(6)
(L3R)/(L1R + L2R + L3R)       0.0068(9) 0.0084(6)
r1(pole) 0.4510(16) 0.4521(14) 0.4517(11) 0.4460(26) 0.4462(11)
r1(side) 0.4840(20) 0.4852(20) 0.4846(15) 0.4779(36) 0.4784(15)
r1(back) 0.5095(19) 0.5102(25) 0.5096(20) 0.5042(47) 0.5058(21)
r2(pole) 0.2627(73) 0.2637(7) 0.2640(5) 0.2724(41) 0.2770(17)
r2(side) 0.2733(86) 0.2746(7) 0.2749(6) 0.2839(49) 0.2891(21)
r2(back) 0.3039(141) 0.3074(7) 0.3077(6) 0.3175(86) 0.3246(37)
φ (deg)     81.5(50.3)   70.6(50.4)
θ (deg)     267.4(4.7)   268.1(26.8)
rs (deg)     36.8(8.0)   36.7(3.6)
Ts/T*     0.80(0.03)   0.8(0.03)
Σ 0.0885 0.0881 0.0589 0.0847 0.0555

Notes. * SD1: solutions converged to a mode 4 semi-detached model with lobe filling primary. SD2: solutions converged to a mode 5 semi-detached model with lobe filling secondary. C: solutions converged to a mode 3 contact model.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

It is obvious that the observed light curves are asymmetric with maximum I slightly brighter than maximum II. This phenomenon of unequal heights at two maxima in the light curve, i.e., the O'Connell effect, exists generally in marginal contact binaries, such as KQ Gem (Hilditch et al. 1998), V432 Per (Yang & Liu 2002), and CN And (Çiçek et al. 2005). To interpret the observed asymmetry, we have therefore used an SD2 model with a cool spot on the secondary component, consistent with its late-type nature (effective temperature ∼4565 K). After many runs, we obtained the solution reported in the fourth column of Table 6. The spot parameters are latitude, φ, longitude, θ, angular radius, rs, and the temperature factor, Ts/T* (where Ts is the temperature of the spot and T* is the local effective temperature of the adjacent photosphere). The corresponding synthetic light curves and the configuration of AS Ser with a spot are shown in Figure 4. Clearly, the addition of a spot gives a better fit to the observed light curves though it still has some deviation. Considering the marginal characteristic, we tried adding a hot spot close to the neck of the binary but failed to reach converged solutions.

According to the orbital period investigation in Section 3, we suspected that a period oscillation may exist in AS Ser. Therefore, we tried adding a third light (i.e., we made l3 an adjustable parameter) to the calculation. The corresponding solutions are listed in Columns 5 and 6 and displayed in Figure 5 which show an improvement in the fitting of the light curves. As Maceroni & van't Veer (1993) pointed out that the spot determination by photometry alone is unreliable due to the uniqueness of the spotted solutions, the parameters with a spot shown in Table 6 are tentative. In the following analyses, we will adopt the parameters without spots for calculation and presentation.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. The theoretical light curves (with l3) and configuration of AS Ser with a cool spot on the secondary component.

Standard image High-resolution image

5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Since no spectroscopic elements have been published, the absolute parameters of the system cannot be determined directly. Assuming that the primary component is a normal, main-sequence star, we can estimate its mass to be 1.5M corresponding to the spectral type F2 (Cox 2000). Combining the photometric solutions and the period, we can estimate the absolute parameters for this system, as reported in Table 7. One can see in Table 7 that the deduced luminosity and radius of the primary component agree well with those of main-sequence stars of the same mass, while the secondary component is overluminous and oversized compared with same-mass main-sequence stars. According to its mass, the secondary component may be an M0 star, which is consistent with the shape of the light curves discussed in Section 2.

Table 7. Estimated Absolute Parameters for AS Ser

Parameter Without l3 With l3 Units
  Primary Secondary Primary Secondary  
Mass 1.5 0.47 1.5 0.52 M
Radius 1.53 0.89 1.52 0.93 R
Luminosity 5.04 0.31 4.97 0.34 L

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

With all available times of light minimum, the OC residuals of AS Ser were analyzed and a new ephemeris was derived which gives a more precise period. The photoelectric and CCD times of light minimum show that the orbital period of the system oscillates with an amplitude of 0.0049 days and a period T = 11.8 yr. The oscillating characteristic of the OC residuals may be the result of the light-time effect due to an additional body or might result from magnetic activity cycles in the two components. If the light-time effect is the reason, assuming that the orbit of the presumed third body is circular, we can obtain the mass function for the third body f(m) = 0.00439M using the following equation:

Equation (4)

where a12 is the distance between the close pair and the center of mass with respect to the third body. With the estimated absolute parameters listed in Table 7, we thus estimate the minimum mass of the additional body to be M3 = 0.28M and the corresponding orbital radius around a3 = 5.93 AU. Supposing that the third body is a main-sequence star, this mass corresponds to an M5 V star with an effective temperature about 3200 K and the absolute bolometric magnitude about 8m fainter than that of the primary component (Cox 2000). Such a large difference makes the third body difficult to detect. The contribution of the tertiary component to the total light in the B, V, and R bands would roughly be 0.42 %, 1.08 %, 1.99 %, respectively, which are similar to the values derived from the WD code. This indicates that the orbital inclination of the third body should be close to 90°. Additionally, the luminosity contribution of the third light increases from the shorter wavelength (B) to the longer wavelength (R), which is consistent with the late-type property of the third body suggested by the period investigation.

As pointed by Pribulla & Rucinski (2006) and D'Angelo et al. (2006), most overcontact binaries exist in multiple systems, so the additional bodies may play an important role in the formation of overcontact binaries by transfer of angular momentum during the Kozai oscillation. NCBs are important transition targets between tidal-locked detached binary systems and W Ursae Major (W UMa)-type overcontact binaries. They have many common characteristics, such as continuum light variation, the O'Connell effect, and the existence of tertiary components. Some NCBs with a possible additional body are listed in Table 8 together with our newly derived one, AS Ser. If this is the case, the angular momenta of these systems may be eliminated due to the tertiary bodies and they will evolve into overcontact binaries in the future.

Table 8. NCBs with Oscillation of Orbital Period Variation

Name Sp. P (days) T (years) Amplitude Ref.
VZ Psc K2-5 0.2613 25 0.0030 Qian et al. (2004)
GO Cyg A0V 0.7178 90 0.0260 Chochol et al. (2006)
BO Peg A7IV 0.5804 63.6 0.0054 Qian (2002)
HL Aur F1V 0.6225 6.5 0.0058 Qian et al. (2006)
RZ Dra A5 0.5500 76 0.0133 Kreiner et al. (1994)
AX Dra F1V 0.5682 56.1 0.0061 Kim et al. (2004)
ZZ Aur A7 0.6013 26.4 0.0053 Oh et al. (2006)
V836 Cyg B9.5 0.6534 29 0.0048 Yakut & Eggleton (2005)
DI Peg F4 0.7118 31.6 0.0055 Lu (1992)
TT Aur B2V 1.3327 12.2 0.0055 Özdemir et al. (2001)
BX And F3 0.6101 71 0.0160 Demircan et al. (1993)
SW Lyn F2V 0.6441 5.768 0.0081 Kim (1999)
TT Her A7V-F2V 0.9121 41.0 0.0058 Kreiner et al. (2008)
AS Ser F2 0.4662 11.8 0.0049 This paper

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

On the other hand, AS Ser is a short-period marginal contact binary with components possibly having a deep convection zone according to their spectral types F2 and M0. The rotational velocity is about 55 times faster than that of the Sun. Therefore, the high rotational velocity and deep convection zone of this system may lead to magnetic activity cycles (Applegate 1992; Lanza et al. 1998; Lanza & Rodonò 1999) in the two components, which is likely to be the reason for the period oscillation. However, the periodic oscillation found in the present study does not cover a complete period. It needs more precise times of light minimum to prove it.

Our photometric solutions indicate that AS Ser is a near-contact binary system with both components filling more than 99% of their Roche lobe. In other words, this system can be considered as a marginal contact binary within parameter uncertainties. The situation of AS Ser resembles those of KQ Gem (Hilditch et al. 1998), CN And (Çiçek et al. 2005), BL And, GW Tau (Zhu & Qian 2006), and UU Lyn (Zhu et al. 2007). They are important targets which lie in the rare phase predicted by the thermal relaxation oscillation (TRO) theory (e.g., Lucy 1976; Flannery 1976; Robertson & Eggleton 1977; Lucy & Wilson 1979). According to the TRO theory, W UMa systems must undergo oscillations around the state of marginal contact. Each oscillation comprises a contact phase followed by a semi-detached phase. When a system exhibits β Lyrae-type light-variation departures from EW light curves, a semi-detached phase with the more massive star filling the Roche lobe followed by a marginal-contact phase with poor thermal contact is to be expected. Therefore, AS Ser may be on the broken stage or at the beginning of the overcontact phase now, and it is a progenitor of a W UMa-type overcontact binary.

This work was partly supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No O8ZKY11001), Chinese Nature Science Foundation (Grant Nos 10433030 10573013, and 10778707), The National Key Fundamental Research Project through Grant 2007CB815406, and Yunnan Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 2005A0059M), and has made use of the Eclipsing Binaries Minimum Database (available at http://www.oa.uj.edu.pl/ktt/krttk_dn.html). We are indebted to the many observers, amateur and professional, who obtained the wealth of data on this eclipsing binary system. We have used data observed with the 1.0 m telescope at the Yunnan Observatory.

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/0004-6256/136/1/337