John E. Gizis et al. 2003 The Astronomical Journal 125 3302 doi:10.1086/374991
John E. Gizis1,8, I. Neill Reid2, Gillian R. Knapp3, James Liebert4, J. Davy Kirkpatrick5, David W. Koerner6 and Adam J. Burgasser7,9
Show affiliationsWe present analysis of Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images of 82 nearby field late M and L dwarfs. We resolve 13 of these systems into double M/L dwarf systems and identify an additional possible binary. Combined with previous observations of 20 L dwarfs, we derive an observed binary fraction for ultracool dwarfs of 17
%, where the statistics included systems with separations in the range 1.6–16 AU. We argue that accounting for biases and incompleteness leads to an estimated binary fraction 15% ± 5% in the range 1.6–16 AU. No systems wider than 16 AU are seen, implying that the wide companion frequency is less than 1.7%; the distribution of orbital separation is peaked at ~2–4 AU and differs greatly from the G dwarf binary distribution. Indirect evidence suggests that the binary fraction is ~5% ± 3% for separations less than 1.6 AU. We find no evidence for differences in the binary fraction between stellar late M and L dwarfs and substellar L dwarfs. We note, however, that the widest (greater than 10 AU) systems in our sample are all of earlier (M8–L0) spectral type; a larger sample is needed to determine if this is a real effect. One system with a spectral type of L7 has a secondary that is fainter in the HST F814W filter but brighter in F1042M; we argue that this secondary is an early T dwarf.
Issue 6 (2003 June)
Received 2002 October 25, accepted for publication 2003 February 21
John E. Gizis et al. 2003 The Astronomical Journal 125 3302
John E. Gizis et al. 2000 The Astronomical Journal 120 1085
R. J. Foley et al. 2009 The Astronomical Journal 137 3731
Adam J. Burgasser et al. 2000 The Astronomical Journal 120 1100
Sergei Nikolaev et al. 2000 The Astronomical Journal 120 3340
I. Neill Reid et al. 2002 The Astronomical Journal 124 519
John E. Gizis et al. 1999 The Astronomical Journal 118 997
John E. Gizis and I. Neill Reid 2006 The Astronomical Journal 131 638
J. Davy Kirkpatrick et al. 2000 The Astronomical Journal 120 447
John E. Gizis and I. Neill Reid 1999 The Astronomical Journal 117 508