R. K. Honeycutt et al. 1998 The Astronomical Journal 115 2527 doi:10.1086/300381
R. K. Honeycutt1, J. W. Robertson1,2 and G. W. Turner1
Show affiliationsOutbursts averaging 0.6 mag in amplitude and 10 days in width are described in five old novae and nova-like cataclysmic variables: UU Aqr, Q Cyg, CP Lac, X Ser, and RW Sex. These stars are thought to be high mass transfer rate systems for which the accretion disk is expected to be stable against the thermal instability responsible for dwarf nova outbursts. The widths and spacings of these events are similar to those of dwarf nova eruptions, but the amplitudes are significantly smaller, or "stunted." The outbursts are sometimes accompanied by dips. These dips have amplitudes that are similar to the outbursts' but have shapes that scatter significantly more than the shapes of the outbursts. The outbursts and dips sometimes occur as pairs and are sometimes isolated. We are not able at this time to determine a single common mechanism for this behavior, or even to conclude that some mechanisms are preferred. Rather, we characterize these phenomena with regard to outburst shapes and frequency of occurrence and explore a range of possible causes, including truncated disks, mass transfer modulations, and Z Camelopardalis type behavior. Arguments are assembled for and against such possible mechanisms, and key observations are suggested. It appears unlikely that accretion disk instabilities are the single common cause of these phenomena, and we are left with either a combination of accretion disk and mass transfer events or a situation in which mass transfer events are somehow responsible for all these varied behaviors.
novae, cataclysmic variables; stars: individual (UU Aquarii, Q Cygni, CP Lacertae, X Serpentis, RW Sextantis)
Issue 6 (1998 June)
Received 1998 January 12, accepted for publication 1998 February 23
R. K. Honeycutt et al. 1998 The Astronomical Journal 115 2527
Zhangjin Chen et al 2007 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40 2333
C Scholey et al 2005 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 31 S1719
Colin J. Lonsdale et al. 2006 ApJ 647 185
Larry W Esposito 2002 Rep. Prog. Phys. 65 1741
S B Whitfield et al 1994 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 27 L359
A Bäcker et al 2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 10293
Katharina Lodders 1999 ApJ 519 793
Gregory Berkolaiko et al 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 8373
James J. Wray et al. 2006 ApJ 652 907