J. Patience et al. 1998 The Astronomical Journal 115 1972 doi:10.1086/300321
J. Patience1, A. M. Ghez1,3,4, I. N. Reid2, A. J. Weinberger2 and K. Matthews2
Show affiliationsA 2.2 μm speckle imaging survey of 167 bright (K < 8.5 mag) Hyades members reveals a total of 33 binaries with separations spanning 0
044 to 1
34 and magnitude differences as large as 5.5 mag. Of these binaries, 9 are new detections and an additional 20 are now spatially resolved spectroscopic binaries, providing a sample from which dynamical masses and distances can be obtained. The closest three systems, marginally resolved at Palomar Observatory, were reobserved with the 10 m Keck Telescope in order to determine accurate binary star parameters. Combining the results of this survey with previous radial velocity, optical speckle, and direct-imaging Hyades surveys, the detected multiplicity of the sample is 98 singles, 59 binaries, and 10 triples.
A statistical analysis of this sample investigates a variety of multiple star formation and evolution theories. Over the binary separation range 0
1–1
07 (5–50 AU), the sensitivity to companion stars is relatively uniform, with
ΔKlim
= 4 mag, equivalent to a mass ratio
qmin
= 0.23. Accounting for the inability to detect high flux ratio binaries results in an implied companion star fraction (CSF) of 0.30 ± 0.06 in this separation range. The Hyades CSF is intermediate between the values derived from observations of T Tauri stars (CSFTTS = 0.40 ± 0.08) and solar neighborhood G dwarfs (CSFSN = 0.14 ± 0.03). This result allows for an evolution of the CSF from an initially high value for the pre-main sequence to that found for main-sequence stars.
Within the Hyades, the CSF and the mass ratio distribution provide observational tests of binary formation mechanisms. The CSF is independent of the radial distance from the cluster center and the primary star mass. The distribution of mass ratios is best fitted by a power law q-1.3±0.3 and shows no dependence on the primary mass, binary separation, or radial distance from the cluster center. Overall, the Hyades data are consistent with scale-free fragmentation, but inconsistent with capture and disk-assisted capture in small clusters. Without testable predictions, scale-dependent fragmentation and disk fragmentation cannot be assessed with the Hyades data.
binaries: general; open clusters and associations: individual (Hyades)
Issue 5 (1998 May)
Received 1997 August 1, accepted for publication 1998 January 8
J. Patience et al. 1998 The Astronomical Journal 115 1972
Hyun Min Lee and Gianmassimo Tasinato JCAP04(2004)009
B J Palmer et al 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 78 012056
Mathew Bligh et al 2008 J. Micromech. Microeng. 18 045002
Sigmund Heller and Walter T Strunz 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 081001
Monika Blanke et al JHEP10(2006)003
C Patrick Maggi et al 2009 Metrologia 46 07003
T Kobayashi et al 2008 J. Micromech. Microeng. 18 035007
Emmanuel Foumouo et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 025017
A Ghobeity et al 2008 J. Micromech. Microeng. 18 055014