Buyong Ma et al 2005 Phys. Biol. 2 S56 doi:10.1088/1478-3975/2/2/S06
Buyong Ma1, Yongping Pan1, K Gunasekaran1, Ozlem Keskin2, R Babu Venkataraghavan3, Arnold J Levine3 and Ruth Nussinov1,4
Show affiliationsDynamic molecular interaction networks underlie biological phenomena. Among the many genes which are involved, p53 plays a central role in networks controlling cellular life and death. It not only operates as a tumor suppressor, but also helps regulate hundreds of genes in response to various types of stress. To accomplish these functions as a guardian of the genome, p53 interacts extensively with both nucleic acids and proteins. This paper examines the physical interfaces of the p53 protein with cellular proteins. Previously, in the analysis of the structures of protein–protein complexes, we have observed that amino acids Trp, Met and Phe are important for protein–protein interactions in general. Here we show that these residues are critical for the many functions of p53. Several clusters of the Trp/Met/Phe residues are involved in the p53 protein–protein interactions. Phe19/Trp23 in the TA1 region extensively binds to the transcriptional factors and the MDM2 protein. Trp53/Phe54 in the TA2 region is crucial for transactivation and DNA replication. Met243 in the core domain interacts with 53BP1, 53BP2 and Rad 51 proteins. Met384/Phe385 in the C-terminal region interacts with the S100B protein and the Bromodomain of the CBP protein. Thus, these residues may assist in elucidating the p53 interactions when structural data are not available.
87.15.K- Molecular interactions; membrane-protein interactions
87.16.Ka Filaments, microtubules, their networks, and supramolecular assemblies
Issue 2 (June 2005)
Received 15 April 2005, accepted for publication 3 June 2005
Published 29 June 2005
Buyong Ma et al 2005 Phys. Biol. 2 S56
Nalini Joshi 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 022001
BIPM 2001 Metrologia 38 95
Peter Seligman 2009 J. Neural Eng. 6 065006
R D Gould and C A Hogarth 1975 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 8 L92
D Basu et al 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 092001
W A van Duyl et al 1984 Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 5 207
Gerald Krause and Martin Zimmermann 1996 Distrib. Syst. Engng. 3 86
Yuji Urata et al 2009 ApJ 706 L183
Gregory Ryskin 2009 New J. Phys. 11 063015