Steen Hannestad et al JCAP09(2005)014 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2005/09/014
Steen Hannestad1, Andreas Ringwald2, Huitzu Tu1 and Yvonne Y Y Wong2
Show affiliationsWe study the difference between thermally produced fermionic and bosonic hot dark matter in detail. In the linear regime of structure formation, their distinct free-streaming behaviours can lead to pronounced differences in the matter power spectrum. While not detectable with current cosmological data, such differences will be clearly observable with upcoming large scale weak lensing surveys for particles as light as mHDM~0.2 eV. In the nonlinear regime, bosonic hot dark matter is not subject to the same phase space constraints that severely limit the amount of fermionic hot dark matter infall into cold dark matter halos. Consequently, the overdensities in fermionic and bosonic hot dark matter of equal particle mass can differ by more than a factor of five in the central part of a halo. However, this unique manifestation of quantum statistics may prove very difficult to detect unless the mass of the hot dark matter particle and its decoupling temperature fall within a very narrow window,
and
. In this case, hot dark matter infall may have some observable consequences for the nonlinear power spectrum and hence the weak lensing convergence power spectrum at
at the per cent level.
E-print Number: astro-ph/0507544
Cited: by |
Refers: to
95.35.+d Dark matter (stellar, interstellar, galactic, and cosmological)
Issue 09 (September 2005)
Received 22 July 2005, accepted for publication 8 September 2005
Published 23 September 2005
Steen Hannestad et al JCAP09(2005)014
Shamit Kachru et al JCAP10(2003)013
D Mogilevtsev 2005 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 7 274
Yi Deng et al 2007 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 9 S256
Neil Anderson et al 2006 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 8 S227
Hugo F Schouten et al 2004 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 6 S277
Giuseppe Schirripa Spagnolo et al 2004 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 6 869
V Petrov et al 2001 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 3 R1
Susanna Orlic et al 2001 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 3 72
Graham Gibson et al 2008 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 10 044009