Steen Hannestad JCAP05(2003)004 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/05/004
Steen Hannestad
Show affiliationsWe have performed a thorough analysis of the constraints which can be put on neutrino parameters from cosmological observations, most notably those from the WMAP satellite and the 2dF galaxy survey. For these data we find an upper limit on the sum of active neutrino mass eigenstates of ∑mν ≤ 1.0 eV (95% conf.), but this limit is dependent on priors. We find that the WMAP and 2dF data alone cannot rule out the evidence from neutrinoless double beta decay reported by the Heidelberg–Moscow experiment. In terms of the relativistic energy density in neutrinos or other weakly interacting species we find, in units of the equivalent number of neutrino species, Nν, that Nν = 4.0+3.0−2.1 (95% conf.). When BBN constraints are added, the bound on Nν is 2.6+0.4−0.3 (95% conf.), suggesting that Nν could possibly be lower than the standard model value of 3. This can, for instance, be the case in models with very low reheating temperature and incomplete neutrino thermalization. Conversely, if Nν is fixed to 3 then the data from WMAP and 2dFGRS predict that 0.2458 ≤ YP ≤ 0.2471 (95% conf.), which is significantly higher than the observationally measured value. The limit on relativistic energy density changes when a small νe chemical potential is present during BBN. In this case the upper bound on Nν from WMAP, 2dFGRS and BBN is Nν ≤ 6.5. Finally, we find that a non-zero ∑mν can be compensated by an increase in Nν. One result of this is that the LSND result is not yet ruled out by cosmological observations.
98.62.Py Distances, redshifts, radial velocities; spatial distribution of galaxies
Issue 05 (May 2003)
Received 11 March 2003, accepted for publication 9 April 2003
Published 15 May 2003
Steen Hannestad JCAP05(2003)004
Zoltan Fodor and Sandor D. Katz JHEP03(2002)014
V Pasquier 1987 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20 L221
V Pasquier 1987 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20 L217
A Kuniba and T Yajima 1988 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 21 519
K Golec-Biernat and J P Phillips 1996 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 22 921
L Boeri et al 2003 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 16 143
E Fertman et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 150 042031
Magdalena Stevanović et al 2009 Nanotechnology 20 335102
Allan N Kaufman 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 169 012002