Stephen R Clark et al 2007 New J. Phys. 9 202 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/202
Stephen R Clark1, Alexander Klein, Martin Bruderer and Dieter Jaksch
Show affiliationsPart of Focus on Measurement-Based Quantum Information Processing
We investigate the influence of noise on a graph state generation scheme which exploits a mirror inverting spin chain. Within this scheme the spin chain is used repeatedly as an entanglement bus (EB) to create multi-partite entanglement. The noise model we consider comprises of each spin of this EB being exposed to independent local noise which degrades the capabilities of the EB. Here we concentrate on quantifying its performance as a single-qubit channel and as a mediator of a two-qubit entangling gate, since these are basic operations necessary for graph state generation using the EB. In particular, for the single-qubit case we numerically calculate the average channel fidelity and whether the channel becomes entanglement breaking, i.e. expunges any entanglement the transferred qubit may have with other external qubits. We find that neither local decay nor dephasing noise cause entanglement breaking. This is in contrast to local thermal and depolarizing noise where we determine a critical length and critical noise coupling, respectively, at which entanglement breaking occurs. The critical noise coupling for local depolarizing noise is found to exhibit a power-law dependence on the chain length. For two-qubits we similarly compute the average gate fidelity and whether the ability for this gate to create entanglement is maintained. The concatenation of these noisy gates for the construction of a five-qubit linear cluster state and a Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state indicates that the level of noise that can be tolerated for graph state generation is tightly constrained.
03.67.Mn Entanglement measures, witnesses, and other characterizations
Issue 6 (June 2007)
Received 16 February 2007
Published 29 June 2007
Stephen R Clark et al 2007 New J. Phys. 9 202
Alexander Klein et al 2007 New J. Phys. 9 411
M Bruderer and D Jaksch 2006 New J. Phys. 8 87
Joanna I House et al 2008 Environ. Res. Lett. 3 044002
E M Cherry and F H Fenton 2008 New J. Phys. 10 125016
Kamran Akhtar et al 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 135207
Apostolos P Georgopoulos et al 2007 J. Neural Eng. 4 349
M V Berry et al 2004 New J. Phys. 6 162
Matt Finer and Martí Orta-Martínez 2010 Environ. Res. Lett. 5 014012
R F Barrett et al 2008 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 125 012034