J Eisert et al 2007 New J. Phys. 9 46 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/3/046
J Eisert1,2,3, F G S L Brandão1,2 and K M R Audenaert1,2
Show affiliationsEntanglement witnesses provide tools to detect entanglement in experimental situations without the need of having full tomographic knowledge about the state. If one estimates in an experiment an expectation value smaller than zero, one can directly infer that the state has been entangled, or specifically multi-partite entangled, in the first place. In this paper, we emphasize that all these tests—based on the very same data—give rise to quantitative estimates in terms of entanglement measures: 'If a test is strongly violated, one can also infer that the state was quantitatively very much entangled'. We consider various measures of entanglement, including the negativity, the entanglement of formation, and the robustness of entanglement, in the bipartite and multipartite setting. As examples, we discuss several experiments in the context of quantum state preparation that have recently been performed.
03.65.Ta Foundations of quantum mechanics; measurement theory
Issue 3 (March 2007)
Received 5 October 2006
Published 2 March 2007
J Eisert et al 2007 New J. Phys. 9 46
John C. Collins and Xiaomin Zu JHEP06(2002)018
P Spitzer 2000 Metrologia 37 85
J.-H. Wang et al. 2009 The Astronomical Journal 138 1893
Jorge Casalderrey-Solana et al JHEP12(2009)066
Arne Brataas et al 2007 New J. Phys. 9 345
E. Winston et al. 2009 The Astronomical Journal 137 4777
R Balbinot 1986 Class. Quantum Grav. 3 L107
Lyndon Evans 2007 New J. Phys. 9 335
Yutaka Okabe 1999 New J. Phys. 1 10