Sarah Bridle and Lindsay King 2007 New J. Phys. 9 444 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/12/444
Sarah Bridle1,3 and Lindsay King2
Show affiliationsPart of Focus on Gravitational Lensing
Cosmic shear constrains cosmology by exploiting the apparent alignments of pairs of galaxies due to gravitational lensing by intervening mass clumps. However, galaxies may become (intrinsically) aligned with each other, and with nearby mass clumps, during their formation. This effect needs to be disentangled from the cosmic shear signal to place constraints on cosmology. We use the linear intrinsic alignment model as a base and compare it to an alternative model and data. If intrinsic alignments are ignored then the dark energy equation of state is biased by ~50%. We examine how the number of tomographic redshift bins affects uncertainties on cosmological parameters and find that when intrinsic alignments are included two or more times as many bins are required to obtain 80% of the available information. We investigate how the degradation in the dark energy figure of merit depends on the photometric redshift scatter. Previous studies have shown that lensing does not place stringent requirements on the photometric redshift uncertainty, so long as the uncertainty is well known. However, if intrinsic alignments are included the requirements become a factor of three tighter. These results are quite insensitive to the fraction of catastrophic outliers, assuming that this fraction is well known. We show the effect of uncertainties in photometric redshift bias and scatter. Finally, we quantify how priors on the intrinsic alignment model would improve dark energy constraints.
98.62.Sb Gravitational lenses and luminous arcs
98.62.Py Distances, redshifts, radial velocities; spatial distribution of galaxies
Issue 12 (December 2007)
Received 4 May 2007
Published 17 December 2007
Sarah Bridle and Lindsay King 2007 New J. Phys. 9 444
Xiangyang Shi et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 1072
P J Stephanou et al 2006 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 34 342
Masahiro Takada and Sarah Bridle 2007 New J. Phys. 9 446
Fred A Mettler Jr et al 2000 J. Radiol. Prot. 20 353
J. P. Wesley 2003 Europhys. Lett. 63 214
Christian J Bell et al 2008 J. Neural Eng. 5 214
E B Lin 1991 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 24 L1045
H Waalkens et al 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 L307
Jorge Sánchez-Ruiz 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 4857