Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article
Deutsche Physikalische Gessellschaft IOP Institute of Physics

Cosmic clocks, cosmic variance and cosmic averages

Focus on Dark Energy

David L Wiltshire

Show affiliations


Part of Focus on Dark Energy

Cosmic acceleration is explained quantitatively, purely in general relativity with matter obeying the strong energy condition, as an apparent effect due to quasilocal gravitational energy differences that arise in the decoupling of bound systems from the global expansion of the universe. 'Dark energy' is recognized as a misidentification of those aspects of gravitational energy which by virtue of the equivalence principle cannot be localized. Matter is modelled as an inhomogeneous distribution of clusters of galaxies in bubble walls surrounding voids, as we observe. Gravitational energy differences between observers in bound systems, such as galaxies, and volume-averaged comoving locations in freely expanding space can be so large that the time dilation between the two significantly affects the parameters of any effective homogeneous isotropic model one fits to the universe. A new approach to cosmological averaging is presented, which implicitly solves the Sandage–de Vaucouleurs paradox. Comoving test particles in freely expanding space, which observe an isotropic cosmic microwave background (CMB), possess a quasilocal 'rest' energy E=langγ(τ,x)rangmc2 on the spatial hypersurfaces of homogeneity. Here 1\leqslant\gamma<\textstyle{\frac{3}{2}} : the lower bound refers to fiducial reference observers at 'finite infinity', which is defined technically in relation to the demarcation scale between bound systems and expanding space. Within voids γ>1, representing the quasilocal gravitational energy of expansion and spatial curvature variations. Since all our cosmological measurements apart from the CMB involve photons exchanged between objects in bound systems, and since clocks in bound systems are largely unaffected, this is entirely consistent with observation. When combined with a non-linear scheme for cosmological evolution with back-reaction via the Buchert equations, a new observationally viable model of the universe is obtained, without 'dark energy'. A quantitative scheme is presented for the recalibration of average cosmological parameters. It uses boundary conditions at the time of last scattering consistent with primordial inflation. The expansion age is increased, allowing more time for structure formation. The baryon density fraction obtained from primordial nucleosynthesis bounds can be significantly larger, yet consistent with primordial lithium abundance measurements. The angular scale of the first Doppler peak in the CMB anisotropy spectrum fits the new model despite an average negative spatial curvature at late epochs, resolving the anomaly associated with ellipticity in the CMB anisotropies. Non-baryonic dark matter to baryonic matter ratios of about 3:1 are typically favoured by observational tests. A number of other testable consequences are discussed, with the potential to profoundly change the whole of theoretical and observational cosmology.


PACS

95.36.+x Dark energy

95.30.Sf Relativity and gravitation

98.70.Vc Background radiations

98.80.Ft Origin, formation, and abundances of the elements

98.80.Jk Mathematical and relativistic aspects of cosmology

98.65.Cw Galaxy clusters

Subjects

Gravitation and cosmology

Particle physics and field theory

Astrophysics and astroparticles

Dates

Issue 10 (2007)

Received 19 February 2007

Published 22 October 2007



  1. Cosmic clocks, cosmic variance and cosmic averages

    David L Wiltshire 2007 New J. Phys. 9 377

  2. Dangerous climate change and the importance of adaptation for the Arctic's Inuit population

    James D Ford 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 024006

  3. Aerosol climate effects and air quality impacts from 1980 to 2030

    Surabi Menon et al 2008 Environ. Res. Lett. 3 024004

  4. An initial analysis of options for a UK feed-in tariff for photovoltaic energy, from an array owner's viewpoint

    Steve Plater 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 044004

  5. Mode selectivity with polarization shaping in the mid-IR

    David B Strasfeld et al 2009 New J. Phys. 11 105046

  6. On the dimensionality of spacetime

    Max Tegmark 1997 Class. Quantum Grav. 14 L69

  7. Structure and stability of two-dimensional Bose–Einstein condensates under both harmonic and lattice confinement

    K J H Law et al 2008 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41 195303

  8. Visualizing a silicon quantum computer

    Barry C Sanders et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 125005

  9. Review of the superconducting properties of MgB2

    Cristina Buzea and Tsutomu Yamashita 2001 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 14 R115

  10. Quantifying the benefits of translation regulation in the unfolded protein response

    Jacob Bock Axelsen and Kim Sneppen 2004 Phys. Biol. 1 159

Related review articles

What's this?
View review articles related to this research to gain an insight into the key trends in this subject area. Related review articles are selected based on PACS/MSC codes, and are no more than three years old.

  1. Formation of the large-scale structure of the Universe

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.