Pengpeng Zhang et al 2006 New J. Phys. 8 200 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/8/9/200
Pengpeng Zhang1, E P Nordberg1, B-N Park1, G K Celler2, I Knezevic1, P G Evans1, M A Eriksson1 and M G Lagally1,3
Show affiliationsSilicon nanomembranes (SiNMs) are very thin, large, free-standing or free-floating two-dimensional (2D) single crystals that can variously be flat, rolled into tubes, or made into any number of odd shapes, cut into millions of identical wires, used as conformal sheets, or chopped into tiny pieces. Because SiNMs are mostly surface or interface and little bulk, they have very interesting properties. We describe electrical conductivity in SiNMs. Because of trap states at the Si/SiO2 interface, bulk dopants become irrelevant to electronic transport when the membrane is thin enough. Replacing the oxide at one interface with the clean-Si surface reconstruction dramatically increases the nanomembrane conductivity. We provide a model for this behaviour. The dimer reconstruction surface states provide a means of 'surface doping'. Other materials with proper highest-occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) or lowest-unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) bands, when deposited on the Si surface, should produce the same conductivity effect, affording a broad opportunity for membrane-based sensors.
73.63.-b Electronic transport in nanoscale materials and structures
71.15.-m Methods of electronic structure calculations
73.40.Qv Metal-insulator-semiconductor structures (including semiconductor-to-insulator)
73.20.At Surface states, band structure, electron density of states
68.35.B- Structure of clean surfaces (and surface reconstruction)
68.37.Ef Scanning tunneling microscopy (including chemistry induced with STM)
Condensed matter: electrical, magnetic and optical
Issue 9 (September 2006)
Received 10 July 2006
Published 20 September 2006
Pengpeng Zhang et al 2006 New J. Phys. 8 200
Fabrizio Pinto 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 164033
José Goldemberg 2006 Environ. Res. Lett. 1 014008
I Baraffe et al 2010 Rep. Prog. Phys. 73 016901
Katherine A. Kornei and Nate McCrady 2009 ApJ 697 1180
S. Valverde et al 2002 Europhys. Lett. 60 512
D G Aronson et al 1997 Nonlinearity 10 1231
A F Fercher et al 2003 Rep. Prog. Phys. 66 239
Jaideep Mulherkar et al J. Stat. Mech. (2008) P01016
Erik M Gauger et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 073027