M Lyutikov 2006 New J. Phys. 8 119 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/8/7/119
M Lyutikov
Show affiliationsPart of Focus on Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Swift Era
The electromagnetic model (EMM) of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and a contrast of its main properties and predictions with the hydrodynamic fireball model (FBM) and its magnetohydrodynamical extension are described. The EMM assumes that rotational energy of a relativistic, stellar-mass central source (black hole–accretion disk system or fast rotating neutron star) is converted into magnetic energy through a unipolar dynamo mechanism, propagated to large distances in the form of relativistic, subsonic, Poynting flux-dominated wind and is dissipated directly into emitting particles through current-driven instabilities. Thus, there is no conversion back and forth between internal and bulk energies as in the case of the fireball model. Collimating effects of magnetic hoop stresses lead to strongly non-spherical expansion and formation of jets. Long and short GRBs may develop in a qualitatively similar way, except that in the case of long burst ejecta expansion has a relatively short, non-relativistic, strongly dissipative stage inside the star. EMMs and FBMs (as well as strongly and weakly magnetized fireballs) lead to different early afterglow dynamics, before deceleration time. Finally, the models are discussed in view of latest observational data in the Swift era.
98.70.Rz &ggr;-ray sources; &ggr;-ray bursts
Issue 7 (July 2006)
Received 14 December 2005
Published 31 July 2006
M Lyutikov 2006 New J. Phys. 8 119
Barbara Paci et al 2000 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 2 268
Andreas Fichtner and Günter Radons 2005 New J. Phys. 7 30
Shao-Meng Qin et al 2007 New J. Phys. 9 220
Florence Yver-Leduc et al 2003 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 5 S136
Fabrizio Lillo et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 043019
G J Daniell and J G McEwen 1984 Eur. J. Phys. 5 215
Marijn Davidse et al JHEP09(2005)065
G. B. Brammer et al 2009 ApJ 706 L173
Filipe C Mena and Paul Tod 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 66 012019