Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article
New J. Phys. 5 (2003) 99
PII: S1367-2630(03)62153-1

Measurement of corrosion content of archaeological lead artifacts by their Meissner response in the superconducting state; a new dating method

S Reich1, G Leitus1 and S Shalev2,3

1Department of Materials and Interfaces, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
2The Helen and Martin Kimmel Centre for Archaeological Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
3University of Haifa, Israel

Email: shimon.reich@weizmann.ac.il

Received 14 April 2003, in final form 2 July 2003
Published 28 July 2003

Abstract. Meissner fraction in the superconducting state of lead archaeological artifacts is used to evaluate the mass of the uncorroded metal in the sample. Knowing the total mass of the sample, the mass of all corrosion products is established. It is shown that this mass correlates with the archaeological age of the lead artifacts over a time span of Inline equation years. Well-dated untreated lead samples from Tel-Dor, the Persian period, Caesarea, the Byzantine and the Crusader periods as well as contemporary data were used to establish the dating correlation. This new chemical dating method is apparently applicable to lead artifacts buried in soils with pH>6.5. In such soils the corrosion process is very slow and the corrosion products, mainly PbO and PbCO3, accumulate over hundreds of years. The method presented is in principle non-destructive.

Contents

1. Introduction

Dating of metal artifacts is in most cases an unsolved problem. We propose a new chemical dating method for lead which is found quite frequently in archaeological excavations. In our method the corrosion extent on the surface of lead, used in antiquity for weights, pipes, claddings etc, is correlated with the burial time of the archaeological artifact. Conceptually our method is similar to the obsidian dating developed in 1960 by Friedman and Smith [1]; see also [2] for a review on chemical methods.

Figure 1

Figure 1. SEM image of a corroded lead disc punched out from an archaeological artifact from the Persian period. PbCO3 crystallites are present on the surface.

Figure 2

Figure 2. XRD spectra, Cu Inline equation radiation; (a) spectrum from the corrosion on the surface of a disc, (b) spectrum from homogenized corrosion powder scraped off the surface of the disc. The sample is from the Persian period.

Lead metal at room temperature exhibits diamagnetic susceptibility of the same order of magnitude as its salts and oxide. However, when cooled below 7.2 K it enters into the superconducting state in which it exhibits the ideal diamagnetic susceptibility. The value of this susceptibility is 104-105 higher than that of its oxide and salts which are not superconductors (s.c.). The value of the volume susceptibility Inline equation of lead in the Meissner state (see [3]), i.e. a state in which there is a total expulsion of the magnetic field from the volume of the lead sample, is Inline equation. This value translates to a molar susceptibility Inline equation of Inline equation cgs. The molar susceptibility of lead oxide and lead salts is of the order of  - 10 - 5 to  - 10 - 4 cgs at room temperature [4] and down to cryogenic temperatures. Thus the contribution to the diamagnetic signal of these compounds at cryogenic temperatures is negligible in comparison to the diamagnetic signal of lead.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Magnetization versus field of a corroded lead disc from the Persian period measured at 5 K. The disc is measured in two configurations; parallel and perpendicular to the external magnetic field. (b) Magnetization versus temperature for two configurations measured in an external magnetic field of 10 Oe in a zero field-cooled experiments.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Magnetization of corroded discs from different periods. Discs are parallel to the external magnetic field and measured at 5 K. The numbers refer to table 1. Note that the slopes of these straight lines are proportional to the mass of the lead metal in the samples and inversely proportional to Inline equation, where Inline equation is the demagnetizing factor for the parallel configuration.

The volume magnetic susceptibility measured in the s.c. state of a corroded lead sample is

Equation (1)

where M is the magnetic moment in emu; Inline equation the density of lead, mPb is the mass of the lead metal in the sample and Inline equation is the demagnetizing factor. Inline equation is shape dependent and its measurement is presented later. H0 is the value of the external magnetic field. Substituting the measured experimental values of M, H0 and Inline equation into equation (1) we solve for the mass of the lead metal mPb. We thus use the magnetic measurement of the corroded sample to determine the mass of the uncorroded lead. This procedure yields the total mass of lead in the sample and does not depend on the spatial distribution of the corrosion materials in the sample, their connectivity and shape, provided this corrosion is on top of a continuous sheet of lead.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Average corrosion mass Inline equation per unit nominal surface area of the discs as function of time. The power law curve is the best fit to the experimental points.

Knowing the total mass of the sample, m, the mass mc of the corrosion products is determined:

Equation (2)

Experimentally we find that this procedure has an accuracy of Inline equation in samples of Inline equation mg.

By measuring the transition temperature to the s.c. state we can distinguish between the relatively pure lead metal phase, Tc =  7.2 K, and homogeneous lead alloy phases which exhibit different values of Tc. Inclusions of a diamagnetic non-superconducting phase in the lead phase will not affect the Tc value.

Lead's corrosion resistance accounts for its successful use in many environments when exposed to the atmosphere, soil, fresh water and sea water (see [5]). Its good resistance in contact with many corrodents is due to the formation of relatively insoluble films of corrosion products deposited on the metal in the initial stages of exposure, which then protect it from further attack. The resistance to corrosion of lead in soils is usually good and it varies with the acidity of the soil. In a controlled corrosion experiment of lead pipes in a number of soils for periods up to 10 years (see [6]) it has been found that for soils with pH above 6.5 the rate of corrosion was between 4 × 10 - 5 and 6 × 10 - 5 cm year - 1. In acidic soils pH 4-5 the rate was about 50 times higher. Thus we may assume that lead buried in sites with similar low value of acidity will have a comparable rate of corrosion over very long time periods. Also it is assumed that the geological conditions such as soil conductivity and water table must have remained relatively constant throughout the archaeological time.

The corrosion products of lead in soil are mainly lead oxide, PbO, and lead carbonate, PbCO3. The solubility of these compounds in water at room temperature is very low, 2.3 × 10 - 3 and 1.1 × 10 - 4 g/100 ml respectively, thus the accumulation of these products on the surface of archaeological artifacts in soil over hundreds of years could be expected.

2. Experimental details and results

In our study the sampling of lead artifacts is done by punching out discs in a corroded untreated lead sheet or ribbon. These discs are 0.5-2.5 mm in thickness and are 4.0 mm in diameter. The punching procedure is performed with a hard steel shearing cylindrical knife.

Table 1. Data for archaeological and contemporary lead artifacts.
Sample no m (mg) mPb (mg) mc (mg) mc/S (mg cm - 2) Shape of artifact Archaeological site Period Approximate time of corrosion (years)
762 118.63 58.6 60.0 240.0 Pb sheet corrosion on both sides Tel Dor soil's pH of the archaeological stratum: 8.23
Surface site control: 8.17
Persian 2430 ± 100
765 120.00 82.9 37.1 148.4 - -
770 121.81 72.7 49.1 196.4 - -
771 114.80 57.7 57.1 228.4 - -
772 110.33 67.7 42.6 170.4 - -
774 98.42 63.3 35.1 140.4 - -
775 151.81 97.6 54.2 216.8     
Average 191.5
Standard error 14.8
807 105.3 82.6 22.7 90.8 Pb ribbon corrosion on both sides Caesarea soil's pH of the archaeological stratum: 7.96
Surface site control: 8.51
Byzantine 1350 ± 100
809 124.0 107.2 16.8 67.2 - -
813 178.8 159.9 28.9 115.6 - -
Average 91.2
Standard error 14.0
796 176.73 155.8 20.9 83.6 Pb ribbon corrosion on both sides Caesarea soil's pH of the archaeological stratum: 7.96
Surface site control: 8.51
Crusader 750 ± 50
797 210.41 200.9 10.5 42.0 - -
799 184.00 158.4 25.6 102.4 - -
800 219.7 203.8 15.9 63.6 - -
Average 72.9
Standard error 13.0
        5.0 Pb pipes Data from Gilbert (1946), soil's pH > 6.5 Contemporary 10

Before the disc is cut, the corroded lead sheet is sandwiched between two paraffin films, which keep the brittle corrosion encapsulated on the sample. After the punching procedure the mass of the disc is measured. A SEM image of the surface of a sample from the Persian period is presented in figure 1. Note the PbCO3 plate-like crystallites on the surface. XRD spectra taken from the surface of the artifact from the Persian period show the following composition: 80 vol% of cerussite, PbCO3, 5 vol% of litharge, PbO; the rest are inclusions in the corrosion layer of SiO2 and some other minerals. After scraping off the corrosion layer from the lead artifact and homogenenizing its content in a mortar the XRD spectrum was measured again. This time we observed 20 vol% of PbCO3 and 75 vol% of PbO. This result shows that the surface of the corroded lead artifact is preferentially covered with cerussite as the XRD technique probes at most 1 µm deep into the artifact. The cerussite mineral, which is practically insoluble, provides a good barrier for the accumulation of litharge in the corrosion layer (figure 2).

Magnetization versus field and versus temperature for the disc samples is measured in a SQUID MPMS2 magnetometer. Magnetization versus field at 5 K and versus temperature in a field of H0 =  10 Oe for lead artifacts Inline equation old, Persian period, excavated in Tel Dor are shown in figure 3. The critical field Hc and the critical temperature, Tc, are the same as those measured in contemporary samples. To calculate the demagnetizing factor, Inline equation, the magnetization in small enough fields, Inline equation Oe, is measured in two configurations: discs parallel and perpendicular to H0. Figure 4 presents data for 14 discs cut out from seven artifacts.

It can be shown that for thin enough discs (see [7])

Equation (3)

where

Unnumbered displayed equation

The mc cm - 2 values for these discs as calculated from equations (3) and (2) are shown in table 1. The archaeological site, the pH of the soil (see [8]) at the site, the archaeological dating of the sampled objects (see [9]) and an estimated corrosion time are presented for samples from the Persian, the Byzantine and the Crusader periods. Contemporary samples are detailed in table 1 as well.

In figure 5 we present the corrosion extent for the above samples as a function of the estimated corrosion time. The power law curve Inline equation, Inline equation, K =  0.12, is the best fit to the experimental points.

3. Discussion

A power law dependence of y on t is reasonable (see [10]). In a very general way the act of corrosion is based on the local existence of an electrochemical cell, which comprises a junction of a metallic oxide to a metal surface on the one hand and to oxygen and water on the other. This cell is characterized by certain potential difference, Inline equation, that drives a current, I, through the cell:

Unnumbered displayed equation

since at

Unnumbered displayed equation

The power law fit is close to a rectilinear line. Such a behaviour is characteristic for a corrosion process in which the continuity of a thin protective layer of oxide on the surface of the metal is controlled by stress. When the layer reaches a certain thickness it breaks down and the metal surface is re-exposed to the environment. More oxide is then formed in contact with the metal, and, after a similar time interval, the thin film of corrosion is again disrupted, and then the process is repeated. The net result of such behaviour is the production of an oxidation curve, which is virtually a straight line (see [10]). This curve may serve for the approximate dating of lead archaeological artifacts buried in soils of relatively high pH, such as carbonate buffered soils, where the corrosion rate is comparable and relatively slow so that time averaging of external condition does occur.

As the relevant corrosion signal grows in time the relative dating accuracy should improve with the age of the sample. Thus the 2500 year span, dictated by the availability of samples, is not an upper limit of our method.

The new method presented here for the determination of lead metal content in a nonmagnetic artifact is in principle non-destructive as it does not require any chemical or mechanical separation of the corrosion products from the lead metal. Thus, for example, lead inclusions in copper, silver and gold ancient coins can also be studied.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the archaeologists A Raban and Y Arnon from the Caesarea excavation, and E Stern and A Gilboa from the Dor excavation, for providing suitable samples from well-dated archaeological contexts.

References

[1]
Friedman I and Smith R L 1960 Am. Antiquity 25 476 
CrossRef
[2]
Aitken M J 1990 Science-Based Dating in Archaeology (New York: Longman) ch 8 
[3]
Meissner W and Ochsenfeld R 1933 Naturwiss. 21 787 
CrossRef
[4]
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 69th edn E111 
[5]
Blaskett D R and Boxall O 1990 Lead and its Alloys (Princeton, NJ: Ellis Horwood) pp 128-40 
[6]
Gilbert P T 1946 J. Inst. Met. 139-74 
[7]
Poole C P Jr, Farach H A and Creswick R J 1995 Superconductivity (New York: Academic) ch 9-12 
[8]
Thomas G W 1996 Chemical methods Methods of Soil Analysis part 3 (Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America) ch 16 
[9]
Renfrew C and Bahn P 1991 Archaeology: Theories, Methods and Practice (London: Thames and Hudson) ch 4 
[10]
Chilton J P 1968 Principles of Metallic Corrosion (London: The Royal Institute of Chemistry) pp 5-13 




Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.