A Laucht et al 2009 New J. Phys. 11 023034 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/2/023034
A Laucht1, F Hofbauer1, N Hauke1, J Angele1, S Stobbe2, M Kaniber1, G Böhm1, P Lodahl2, M-C Amann1 and J J Finley1,3
Show affiliationsWe report the design, fabrication and optical investigation of electrically tunable single quantum dots—photonic crystal defect nanocavities operating in both the weak and strong coupling regimes of the light–matter interaction. Unlike previous studies where the dot–cavity spectral detuning was varied by changing the lattice temperature, or by the adsorption of inert gases at low temperatures, we demonstrate that the quantum-confined Stark effect can be employed to quickly and reversibly switch the dot–cavity coupling simply by varying a gate voltage. Our results show that exciton transitions from individual dots can be tuned by ~4 meV relative to the nanocavity mode before the emission quenches due to carrier tunneling escape. This range is much larger than the typical linewidth of the high-Q cavity modes (~100 μeV) allowing us to explore and contrast regimes where the dots couple to the cavity or decay by spontaneous emission into the two-dimensional photonic bandgap. In the weak-coupling regime, we show that the dot spontaneous emission rate can be tuned using a gate voltage, with Purcell factors ≥7. New information is obtained on the nature of the dot–cavity coupling in the weak coupling regime, and electrical control of zero-dimensional polaritons is demonstrated for the highest-Q cavities (Q≥12 000). Vacuum Rabi splittings up to ~120 μeV are observed, larger than the linewidths of either the decoupled exciton (γ≤40 μeV) or cavity mode. These observations represent a voltage switchable optical nonlinearity at the single photon level, paving the way towards on-chip dot-based nano-photonic devices that can be integrated with passive optical components.
42.70.Qs Photonic bandgap materials
78.20.Jq Electrooptical effects
Condensed matter: electrical, magnetic and optical
Surfaces, interfaces and thin films
Issue 2 (February 2009)
Received 24 October 2008
Published 20 February 2009
A Laucht et al 2009 New J. Phys. 11 023034
Yuki Nagai et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 103026
K Morawetz et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 103014
Dmitri Kharzeev and Kirill Tuchin JHEP09(2008)093
Jesse Thaler and Lian-Tao Wang JHEP07(2008)092
Chiang-Mei Chen et al JHEP11(2006)044
Joerg Jaeckel et al JHEP02(2006)028
Amit Giveon et al JHEP08(2004)014
Roshan Foadi et al JHEP03(2004)042
Chiang-Mei Chen et al JHEP10(2003)058