Brought to you by:

Surface Stabilities of Various Crystal Faces of CuInSe2 and Related Compounds by First-Principles Calculation

and

Published 22 October 2012 Copyright (c) 2012 The Japan Society of Applied Physics
, , Citation Akio Shigemi and Takahiro Wada 2012 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 51 10NC22 DOI 10.1143/JJAP.51.10NC22

1347-4065/51/10S/10NC22

Abstract

The typical crystal surfaces of CuInSe2 (CISe) and related compounds were studied using density functional theory (DFT) methods. We evaluated energies and surface structures of (112), (bar 1bar 1bar 2), (110), (102), (100), (bar 100), (001), and (00bar 1) surfaces on CISe. For CISe, the (112) surface had the lowest energy among these surfaces, and the (110) and (102) surfaces had slightly higher energies than the (112) surface. These surface atoms coordinate with the three surrounding atoms. We found that the (112) surface is most stable for CISe, and this result is consistent with the experimental results showing that the (112) surface is most frequently observed in polycrystalline CISe thin films. We also evaluated the surface energies of CuGaSe2 (CGSe), CuAlSe2 (CASe), CuInS2 (CIS), CuInTe2 (CIT), and AgInSe2 (AISe). For CGSe, CIS, and CIT, the (112) surface had the lowest energy as in the case of CISe. However, for CASe and AISe, the (110) surface had the lowest energy.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1143/JJAP.51.10NC22