Andrzej J. Buras et al JHEP01(2003)029 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/01/029
Andrzej J. Buras1, Fabrizio Parodi2 and Achille Stocchi3,4
Show affiliationsThe unitarity triangle can be determined by means of two measurements of its sides or angles. Assuming the same relative errors on the angles (α,β,γ) and the sides (Rb,Rt), we find that the pairs (γ,β) and (γ,Rb) are most efficient in determining (
,
) that describe the apex of the unitarity triangle. They are followed by (α,β), (α,Rb), (Rt,β), (Rt,Rb) and (Rb,β). As the set |Vus|, |Vcb|, Rt and β appears to be the best candidate for the fundamental set of flavour violating parameters in the coming years, we show various constraints on the CKM matrix in the (Rt,β) plane. Using the best available input we determine the universal unitarity triangle for models with minimal flavour violation (MFV) and compare it with the one in the Standard Model. We present allowed ranges for sin 2β, sin 2α, γ, Rb, Rt and ΔMs within the Standard Model and MFV models. We also update the allowed range for the function Ftt that parametrizes various MFV-models.
E-print Number: hep-ph/0207101
Cited: by |
Refers: to
11.55.-m S-matrix theory; analytic structure of amplitudes
12.39.-x Phenomenological quark models
12.10.Dm Unified theories and models of strong and electroweak interactions
Issue 01 (January 2003)
Received 23 October 2002, accepted for publication 15 January 2003
Published 7 February 2003
Andrzej J. Buras et al JHEP01(2003)029
Yue Zheng and C H Woo 2009 Nanotechnology 20 075401
Bruno Giacomazzo and Luciano Rezzolla 2007 Class. Quantum Grav. 24 S235
Graham M. Harper et al. 2008 The Astronomical Journal 135 1430
Gian Mario Manca et al 2007 Class. Quantum Grav. 24 S171
Sarah M Jordaan et al 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 024004
Thomas Vojta 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 R143
Thomas Foertsch et al 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 4635
Y Tsuchiya 1987 J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 20 5001
R.J. Taylor et al 2005 Nucl. Fusion 45 1634