M P McEwen et al 2009 Physiol. Meas. 30 869 doi:10.1088/0967-3334/30/9/001
M P McEwen1,2, G P Bull2 and K J Reynolds1
Show affiliationsDespite its success as a clinical monitoring tool, pulse oximetry may be improved with respect to the need for empirical calibration and the reports of biases in readings associated with peripheral vasoconstriction and haemoglobin concentration. To effect this improvement, this work aims to improve the understanding of the photoplethysmography signal—as used by pulse oximeters—and investigates the effect of vessel calibre and haemoglobin concentration on pulse oximetry. The digital temperature and the transmission of a wide spectrum of light through the fingers of 57 people with known haemoglobin concentrations were measured and simulations of the transmission of that spectrum of light through finger models were performed. Ratios of pulsatile attenuations of light as used in pulse oximetry were dependent upon peripheral temperature and on blood haemoglobin concentration. In addition, both the simulation and in vivo results showed that the pulsatile attenuation of light through fingers was approximately proportional to the absorption coefficients of blood, only when the absorption coefficients were small. These findings were explained in terms of discrete blood vessels acting as barriers to light transmission through tissue. Due to the influence of discrete blood vessels on light transmission, pulse oximeter outputs tend to be dependent upon haemoglobin concentration and on the calibre of pulsing blood vessels—which are affected by vasoconstriction/vasodilation. The effects of discrete blood vessels may account for part of the difference between the Beer–Lambert pulse oximetry model and empirical calibration.
87.80.-y Biophysical techniques (research methods)
Issue 9 (September 2009)
Received 22 December 2008, accepted for publication 22 June 2009
Published 27 July 2009
A Corrigendum for this article has been published in 2010 Physiol. Meas. 31 727
M P McEwen et al 2009 Physiol. Meas. 30 869
S F Baker et al 2004 Meas. Sci. Technol. 15 501
J M Speight and Y Zolotaryuk 2006 Nonlinearity 19 1365
Lintao Cai et al 2001 Nanotechnology 12 211
Elizabeth Swinbank 2004 Phys. Educ. 39 52
M Mukherjee et al 1990 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 23 757
Mikko S Laasanen et al 2005 Phys. Med. Biol. 50 N49
A K Kazansky and N M Kabachnik 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 121002
David V Sheludko et al 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 80 012040
Ataru Kobayashi et al 2002 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35 2087