Ryan J Halter et al 2009 Physiol. Meas. 30 S121 doi:10.1088/0967-3334/30/6/S08
Ryan J Halter1, Tian Zhou, Paul M Meaney, Alex Hartov, Richard J Barth Jr, Kari M Rosenkranz, Wendy A Wells, Christine A Kogel, Andrea Borsic, Elizabeth J Rizzo and Keith D Paulsen
Show affiliationsElectromagnetic (EM) breast imaging provides low-cost, safe and potentially a more specific modality for cancer detection than conventional imaging systems. A primary difficulty in validating these EM imaging modalities is that the true dielectric property values of the particular breast being imaged are not readily available on an individual subject basis. Here, we describe our initial experience in seeking to correlate tomographic EM imaging studies with discrete point spectroscopy measurements of the dielectric properties of breast tissue. The protocol we have developed involves measurement of in vivo tissue properties during partial and full mastectomy procedures in the operating room (OR) followed by ex vivo tissue property recordings in the same locations in the excised tissue specimens in the pathology laboratory immediately after resection. We have successfully applied all of the elements of this validation protocol in a series of six women with cancer diagnoses. Conductivity and permittivity gauged from ex vivo samples over the frequency range 100 Hz–8.5 GHz are found to be similar to those reported in the literature. A decrease in both conductivity and permittivity is observed when these properties are gauged from ex vivo samples instead of in vivo. We present these results in addition to a case study demonstrating how discrete point spectroscopy measurements of the tissue can be correlated and used to validate EM imaging studies.
87.63.Pn Electrical impedance tomography (EIT)
87.19.R- Mechanical and electrical properties of tissues and organs
Issue 6 (June 2009)
Received 1 December 2008, accepted for publication 19 February 2009
Published 2 June 2009
Ryan J Halter et al 2009 Physiol. Meas. 30 S121
Amit J Nimunkar and John G Webster 2009 Physiol. Meas. 30 101
Andy Adler et al 2008 Physiol. Meas. 29 S101
Xiao Hu et al 2008 Physiol. Meas. 29 459
Andy Adler et al 2007 Physiol. Meas. 28 S1
Yednek Asfaw and Andy Adler 2005 Physiol. Meas. 26 S175
Melissa Suter et al 2004 Physiol. Meas. 25 837
Daniel S Moran et al 2004 Physiol. Meas. 25 51
Andy Adler 2004 Physiol. Meas. 25 227
A D Kshemkalyani et al 1995 Distrib. Syst. Engng. 2 224