Camille Gómez-Laberge and Andy Adler 2008 Physiol. Meas. 29 S89 doi:10.1088/0967-3334/29/6/S08
Camille Gómez-Laberge and Andy Adler
Show affiliationsElectrical impedance tomography (EIT) is very sensitive to deformations of the medium boundary shape. For lung imaging, breathing and changes in posture move the electrodes and change the chest shape, resulting in image artefacts. Several approaches have been proposed to improve the reconstructed images; most methods reconstruct both the boundary deformation and conductivity change from the measured data. These techniques require the calculation of the 'movement Jacobian', reflecting measurement changes due to the boundary deformation. Previous papers have calculated this Jacobian using perturbation techniques, which are slow (requiring multiple solutions of the forward problem) and become inaccurate with increasing finite element model size. This effect has limited reconstruction algorithms for deformable media to mostly 2D. To address this problem, we propose a direct method to calculate the Jacobian, based on a formulation of the derivatives of the finite element system matrix with respect to geometry changes. An illustrative example of these calculations is given, as well as a comparison between the proposed method and a perturbation method. Results show this method is ≈300 times faster; and for larger model sizes, the perturbation method begins to diverge from those from the direct method proposed.
87.63.Pn Electrical impedance tomography (EIT)
87.19.R- Mechanical and electrical properties of tissues and organs
Issue 6 (June 2008)
Received 17 December 2007, accepted for publication 7 February 2008
Published 10 June 2008
Camille Gómez-Laberge and Andy Adler 2008 Physiol. Meas. 29 S89
S Wickramasekara and A Bohm 2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 807
Barbara M Johnston and Peter R Johnston 2007 Phys. Med. Biol. 52 2531
Y Sakamoto et al 1996 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8 3229
S-L Blyth et al 2007 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 34 271
Bernard Jancewicz and Piotr Brzeski 2005 Eur. J. Phys. 26 617
Vadim V Cheianov and M B Zvonarev 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 2261
M Moisan and Z Zakrzewski 1991 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 24 1025
L P Kadanoff and M Kleine Berkenbusch 2005 Nonlinearity 18 937
T Garidi et al 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 245