2009 Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 17 080201 doi:10.1088/0965-0393/17/8/080201
First-principles methods based on density functional theory (DFT) have been the mainstay of theoretical studies of the properties of semiconductor and oxide materials. Despite the tremendous successes of the past few decades, significant challenges remain in adapting these methods for predictive simulations that are quantitatively useful in predicting device behavior. Recent advances in computational capabilities, and improved theoretical methods taking advantage of ever more powerful computer hardware, offer the possibility that computational modeling may finally fulfill the long-sought goal of truly predictive simulations for defect properties. The exciting prospect of using modelling as `virtual experiments' to obtain quantitatively accurate predictions of semiconductor behavior seems tantalizingly close, but challenges still remain, which is evident in the many divergent approaches adopted for the modelling and simulation of various aspects of defect behavior.
This special issue consists of papers describing different approaches to the study of defects, and the challenges that remain from the perspective of leading scientists in the field. It includes contributions on the theoretical and computational issues of using density functional methods for defect calculations [Nieminen], treatments to account for finite computational cell effects in periodic defect supercell calculations using analytical constructions [Lany and Zunger], or cell-size extrapolation techniques [Castleton et al], or instead using embedded cluster calculations to model charge-trapping defects [Shluger et al]. This issue also includes a description of the computation of g-tensor and hyperfine splitting for defect centers [Valentin and Pacchione], computation of vibrational properties of impurities from dynamical DFT calculations [Estreicher et al], and the use of DFT supercell calculations to predict charge transition energy levels of intrinsic defects in GaAs [Schultz and von Lilienfeld]. One contribution discusses the challenges of translating the results at the microscale into the macroscopic response of the material in a multiscale approach [Makov et al], and the issue closes with a discussion of neglected gaps in the first-principles modelling of defects, important problems that are commonly overlooked and perhaps deserving greater attention [Stoneham].
All papers were peer-reviewed following the standard procedure established by the Editorial Board of Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering.
Peter A Schultz Sandia National Laboratories, USA
Guest Editor
Issue 8 (1 December 2009)
2009 Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 17 080201
F Barone et al 1997 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 30 1575
J N Churchill and F E Holmstrom 1994 Phys. Scr. 50 305
V Bouchiat et al 2003 Nanotechnology 14 77
C DeW Van Siclen 1985 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Phys. 11 267
A M Lesk 1980 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 13 L111
D R K Reddy 1977 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 10 185
H Chakir et al 1997 Class. Quantum Grav. 14 2049
M Kumagai et al 2008 Metrologia 45 139
Stephen R Magill 2007 New J. Phys. 9 409