M A Tschopp et al 2008 Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 16 065009 doi:10.1088/0965-0393/16/6/065009
M A Tschopp1,2, G B Wilks1,3 and J E Spowart1
Show affiliationsComputer-generated 2D microstructures of varying second phase area fraction (5–30%), aspect ratio (1–16) and degree of alignment (where the reinforcement major-axis orientation is random, perfectly aligned or semi-aligned) are analyzed via the isotropic and directional forms of the computationally efficient multi-scale analysis of area fractions (MSAAF) technique. The impact of these microstructure parameters on the representative volume element (RVE) necessary to characterize a microstructure is ascertained with variations in isotropic and directional homogeneous length scales, derivative quantities of the MSAAF technique. Analysis of these results produces empirical expressions for the directional homogeneous length scale as a function of area fraction and aspect ratio for the limiting cases of random and 'perfect' second phase alignment. Generally, particle alignment is observed to increase the aspect ratio of a microstructure's RVE—a trend amplified by higher reinforcement aspect ratios and lower area fractions. Particle alignment also decreases the absolute size of such an element by reducing the directional homogeneous length scales transverse to the axis of alignment. Periodic boundary conditions on the perimeter of the synthetic microstructures are used to characterize the error in the MSAAF technique via multiple instantiations of the same microstructure, which further indicates that the statistical variation in the directional homogeneous length scale (measured by the directional MSAAF technique) can be an order of magnitude less than the variation in the isotropic homogeneous length scale (measured by the isotropic MSAAF technique).
81.40.Lm Deformation, plasticity, and creep
62.20.M- Structural failure of materials
62.20.F- Deformation and plasticity
81.40.Jj Elasticity and anelasticity, stress-strain relations
81.40.Np Fatigue, corrosion fatigue, embrittlement, cracking, fracture, and failure
Issue 6 (September 2008)
Received 23 May 2008
Published 12 August 2008
M A Tschopp et al 2008 Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 16 065009
S Mokkapati et al 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 085104
Z Yang et al 2008 Nanotechnology 19 025604
Spencer Chang et al JCAP04(2008)034
Xiaofang Chen et al 2010 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 37 015004
M F Kling et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 025024
Tom Banks and Lubos Motl JHEP03(2000)027
Jong Young Kim et al 2008 J. Micromech. Microeng. 18 055027
Gerald A Urban 2009 Meas. Sci. Technol. 20 012001
Miguel Preto and Prasenjit Saha 2009 ApJ 703 1743