Gopalakrishna M Kamath et al 1996 Smart Mater. Struct. 5 576 doi:10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/007
Gopalakrishna M Kamath, Melanie K Hurt and Norman M Wereley
Show affiliationsElectrorheological- (ER-) fluid-based dashpot dampers have smart capabilities because ER fluids undergo large changes in yield stress as electric field is applied. Our objective is the development and experimental validation of quasi-steady dashpot damper models, based on an idealized nonlinear Bingham plastic shear flow mechanism, for purposes of preliminary design and performance predictions. The data required for the Bingham plastic model is normally supplied by ER fluid suppliers, that is, plastic viscosity and dynamic yield stress as a function of applied field, as determined from a shear stress versus shear strain rate diagram. As force is applied to the dashpot damper, the ER fluid flows through an annulus between the concentric inner and outer electrodes. The idealized Bingham plastic shear flow mechanism predicts that three annular flow regions develop as a function of the local shear stress. In the central pre-yield or plug region, the local shear stress is less than the dynamic yield stress, so that the plug behaves like a rigid solid. The remaining two annular regions, adjacent to the electrodes, are in the post-yield condition and correspond to the shear stress exceeding the dynamic yield stress, so that the material flows. Equivalent viscous damping performance of an ER fluid dashpot damper is strongly coupled with the plug behavior. For a constant force, as the applied field increases, so does the plug thickness and equivalent viscous damping. For a constant applied field, as the force increases, the plug thickness and equivalent viscous damping both decrease. The passive and active or field-dependent damping behavior of an ER-fluid-based dashpot damper can be designed for a specific application using these quasi-steady Bingham plastic models.
83.80.Gv Electro- and magnetorheological fluids
83.50.Ax Steady shear flows, viscometric flow
Issue 5 (October 1996)
Received 15 May 1996, accepted for publication 15 August 1996
Gopalakrishna M Kamath et al 1996 Smart Mater. Struct. 5 576
U Czarnetzki et al 1999 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 8 230
L Luo et al 2006 New J. Phys. 8 213
R.P. Doerner et al 1994 Nucl. Fusion 34 975
John S Anderson 1920 Trans. Opt. Soc. 21 195
C J Isham et al 1990 Class. Quantum Grav. 7 1053
C J S Clarke and T Dray 1987 Class. Quantum Grav. 4 265
H B Pedersen et al 2005 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 4 168
Anne-Louise Burness et al 1999 Distrib. Syst. Engng. 6 129
A Maréchal 1973 Nouvelle Revue d'Optique 4 315