Sreeja Rajesh et al 2005 Smart Mater. Struct. 14 413 doi:10.1088/0964-1726/14/2/016
Sreeja Rajesh1,2,3,4, David O'Carroll1,3 and Derek Abbott1,2
Show affiliationsThe study of insect vision is of significant interest to engineers for inspiring the design of future motion-sensitive smart sensor devices, for collision avoidance applications. Although insects are relatively simple organisms compared to vertebrates, they are blessed with a very efficient visual system, which enables them to navigate with great ease and accuracy. Biologically inspired motion detection models are bound to replace the conventional machine vision technology because of their simplicity and significant advantages in a number of applications. The dominant model for insect motion detection, first proposed by Hassentein and Reichardt in 1956, has gained widespread acceptance in the invertebrate vision community. The template model is another known model proposed later by Horridge in 1990, which permits simple tracking techniques and lends itself easily to both hardware and software. In this paper, we compare these two different motion detecting strategies. It was found from the data obtained from the intracellular recordings of the steady-state responses of wide-field neurons in the hoverfly Volucella, that the shape of the curves obtained agree with the theoretical predictions made by Dror. In order to compare this with the template model, we carried out an experiment to obtain the velocity response curves of the template model to the same image statistics. The results lead us to believe that the fly motion detector emulates a modified Reichardt correlator.
In the second part of the paper, modifications are made to the Reichardt detector that improve its performance in velocity detection by reducing its dependance on contrast and image structure. Our recent neurobiological experiments suggest that adaptive mechanisms decrease the EMD (elementary motion detector) dependence on pattern contrast and improve reliability. So appropriate modelling of an adaptive feedback mechanism is carried out to normalize contrast of input signals in order to improve the reliability and robustness of velocity estimation.
07.07.Df Sensors (chemical, optical, electrical, movement, gas, etc.); remote sensing
Instrumentation and measurement
Issue 2 (April 2005)
Received 1 April 2003, in final form 13 September 2004
Published 4 March 2005
Sreeja Rajesh et al 2005 Smart Mater. Struct. 14 413
S Torven et al 1985 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 27 143
Ferdinand Peper et al 2003 Nanotechnology 14 469
A Moroz 1994 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6 171
Julien Laurat et al 2007 New J. Phys. 9 207
S E Venegas-Andraca et al 2005 New J. Phys. 7 221
J G Titus et al 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 044008
Louis J Rubbo 2007 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 60 268
Maciej Konacki et al. 2003 ApJ 597 1076
Masahiro Ikoma et al. 2000 ApJ 537 1013