Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

A low-drift, open-loop controlled, single crystalline silicon micromirror with floating field-limiting shields

Byung-Wook Yoo1, Jae-Hyoung Park2, Yun-Ho Jang3 and Yong-Kweon Kim1

Show affiliations


This paper describes the design, fabrication and testing of a one-axis micromirror in order to suppress the electric charging problem related to its actuation. The electrostatically-actuated torsional micromirror is of the parallel-plate type. Since the dielectric around the electrodes below the mirror plates is highly exposed, we installed gold shields in the floating state around the electrodes, so as to cover the exposed dielectric surface. The gold shields played a leading role in limiting the electric field between the electrodes. This effect was characterized and the tilting angle stability was measured by observing the micromirror performance with and without the floating field-limiting shields. Drift measurements of these two types of micromirrors were made using a position-sensing detector (PSD). The micromirror with the field-limiting shields, namely micromirror type A, showed a tilting angle drift of 0.005° at 83% of the pull-in voltage, while a tilting angle drift of 0.5° was measured at the same percentage of the pull-in voltage for the micromirror without the field-limiting shields, namely micromirror type B. At 97.7% of the pull-in voltage, the pull-in phenomenon occurred after 220 s for micromirror type B due to the charging effect. On the other hand, micromirror type A showed no pull-in phenomena with elapsed time at a bias of 97.7% of the pull-in voltage due to the resolution of the charging effect.


PACS

85.30.De Semiconductor-device characterization, design, and modeling

42.79.Bh Lenses, prisms and mirrors

Subjects

Electronics and devices

Semiconductors

Optics, quantum optics and lasers

Dates

Issue 3 (March 2008)

Received 23 March 2007, in final form 2 November 2007

Published 13 February 2008



  1. A low-drift, open-loop controlled, single crystalline silicon micromirror with floating field-limiting shields

    Byung-Wook Yoo et al 2008 J. Micromech. Microeng. 18 035031

  2. Effect of substrate hardness and film structure on indentation depth criteria for film hardness testing

    Ilze Manika and Janis Maniks 2008 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 074010

  3. Final report on EUROMET Project 427, EUROMET.EM-S7: Comparison of AC and DC conductivity standards

    Stuart Harmon et al 2009 Metrologia 46 01009

  4. Gauged U(1)R symmetries and Fayet-Iliopoulos terms in 5D orbifold supergravity

    Hiroyuki Abe and Kiwoon Choi JHEP12(2004)069

  5. Fractional branes and wrapped branes

    Duiliu-Emanuel Diaconescu et al JHEP02(1998)013

  6. Report of the spectral irradiance comparison EURAMET.PR-K1.a.1 between MIKES (Finland) and NIMT (Thailand)

    M Ojanen et al 2009 Metrologia 46 02001

  7. CCQM-K11: The determination of glucose in serum

    Michael J Welch et al 2003 Metrologia 40 08003

  8. B → η(') form factors in QCD

    Patricia Ball and Gareth W. Jones JHEP08(2007)025

  9. Report on Key Comparison EUROMET.EM-K8.1 (DC voltage ratio)

    G Marullo Reedtz and R Cerri 2005 Metrologia 42 01003

  10. BIPM comparison BIPM.RI(II)-K1.F-18 of activity measurements of the radionuclide 18F

    G Ratel and C Michotte 2003 Metrologia 40 06005

View by subject




Export








Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.