Mohammad I Younis et al 2006 J. Micromech. Microeng. 16 2463 doi:10.1088/0960-1317/16/11/030
Mohammad I Younis, Ronald Miles and Daniel Jordy
Show affiliationsThere is strong experimental evidence for the existence of strange modes of failure of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) devices under mechanical shock and impact. Such failures have not been explained with conventional models of MEMS. These failures are characterized by overlaps between moving microstructures and stationary electrodes, which cause electrical shorts. This work presents modeling and simulation of MEMS devices under the combination of shock loads and electrostatic actuation, which sheds light on the influence of these forces on the pull-in instability. Our results indicate that the reported strange failures can be attributed to early dynamic pull-in instability. The results show that the combination of a shock load and an electrostatic actuation makes the instability threshold much lower than the threshold predicted, considering the effect of shock alone or electrostatic actuation alone. In this work, a single-degree-of-freedom model is utilized to investigate the effect of the shock–electrostatic interaction on the response of MEMS devices. Then, a reduced-order model is used to demonstrate the effect of this interaction on MEMS devices employing cantilever and clamped–clamped microbeams. The results of the reduced-order model are verified by comparing with finite-element predictions. It is shown that the shock–electrostatic interaction can be used to design smart MEMS switches triggered at a predetermined level of shock and acceleration.
85.85.+j Micro- and nano-electromechanical systems (MEMS/NEMS) and devices
Issue 11 (November 2006)
Received 2 August 2006, in final form 3 September 2006
Published 4 October 2006
Mohammad I Younis et al 2006 J. Micromech. Microeng. 16 2463
Boncho P. Bonev et al. 2006 ApJ 653 774
J. C. Mather et al. 1999 ApJ 512 511
N V Agudov et al 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 5279
K Andrae et al 2002 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35 4203
I Bray et al 2002 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35 R117
Ali H Nayfeh and Mohammad I Younis 2005 J. Micromech. Microeng. 15 1840
S J Antony et al 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 3944
Michiel R. Hogerheijde et al. 1999 ApJ 513 350
Robert C. Kennicutt, Jr. 1998 ApJ 498 541