Massimo Antognozzi et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 3897 doi:10.1088/0957-4484/17/15/047
Massimo Antognozzi1,4, Alex Wotherspoon1, Jonathan M Hayes1, Mervyn J Miles1, Mark D Szczelkun2 and Giovanni Valdrè3
Show affiliationsMuscovite mica is commonly used to immobilize DNA molecules onto a flat surface. This method, however, requires either the use of divalent cations in the buffer solution or the chemical modification of the surface. Here we show that DNA molecules have different binding affinities and assume different conformations when adsorbed to different layered minerals. In particular, the effect of biotite, muscovite, talc, brucite and chlorite upon DNA binding is investigated. Using atomic force microscopy it is possible to quantify the amount of DNA deposited onto a flat surface and it is experimentally confirmed that biotite, talc and brucite have a much higher affinity than muscovite (7-, 20- and 25-fold more volume of DNA deposited, respectively). The deposition of DNA onto chlorite presents areas (brucite-like) with high DNA coverage and areas (mica-like) where DNA molecules are absent. We regularly observed isolated DNA molecules that became stretched across these regions of low affinity. The stretching is not induced by the deposition procedure but is driven by the surface potential gradient between brucite-like and mica-like regions in chlorite. The active stretching of DNA on chlorite is a clear indication of the technological potential carried by these materials when used as substrates for biomolecules.
87.15.H- Dynamics of biomolecules
87.15.La Mechanical properties
36.20.Hb Configuration (bonds, dimensions)
87.15.M- Spectra of biomolecules
Issue 15 (14 August 2006)
Received 20 April 2006, in final form 23 May 2006
Published 11 July 2006
Massimo Antognozzi et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 3897
David J Siminovitch and Simon Habot 1997 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 30 2577
S G Schirmer et al 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 1389
J T Lin and T F Jiang 2000 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 33 3023
J C Camparo and R P Frueholz 1984 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 17 4169
Witold Chałupczak and Krzysztof Szymaniec 2006 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 39 1081
Bogdan A Bernevig and Han-Dong Chen 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 8325
A Karpati and Z Kis 2003 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 36 905
Luís E E de Araujo and Ian A Walmsley 2003 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 5 R27
Marco Frasca 2001 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 3 S15