M T Cuberes et al 2001 Nanotechnology 12 53 doi:10.1088/0957-4484/12/1/310
M T Cuberes1,2, G A D Briggs1 and O Kolosov1,3
Show affiliationsUltrasonic vibration can be nonlinearly detected by means of an atomic force microscopy cantilever when the tip is in contact with a sample surface owing to the so-called (sample-induced) ultrasonic force. The procedure has been developed as a novel technique, ultrasonic force microscopy (UFM), that provides information about the nanoscale elastic and adhesive properties of surfaces. Here, we compare differences in the UFM signal when ultrasound is excited from the back of the sample (sample UFM) and from the cantilever base (waveguide UFM). UFM relies on the nonlinear ultrasound-induced cantilever displacement (due to the aforementioned ultrasonic force), and does not monitor the linear high-frequency vibration of the cantilever. In this paper, we discuss the influence of a linear high-frequency cantilever response in the UFM measurements and provide experimental evidence of the feasibility of nonlinearly detecting the free ultrasonic cantilever vibration when the tip is out of contact with the sample surface using the typical laser-beam deflection method for monitoring cantilever displacements.
43.40.+s Structural acoustics and vibration
07.10.Pz Instruments for strain, force, and torque
Instrumentation and measurement
Issue 1 (March 2001)
Received 20 September 2000, in final form 5 December 2000
M T Cuberes et al 2001 Nanotechnology 12 53
Zhiwen Yu and Tianru Jin 2008 Science Foundation in China 16 23
Bellengham and Stanley, Ltd. 1939 J. Sci. Instrum. 16 165
R Luce and S Perez 1999 Inverse Problems 15 291
K W Leszczynski et al 1990 Phys. Med. Biol. 35 429
A N Kolmogorov 1983 Russ. Math. Surv. 38 29
M Fitzsimons et al 1999 Physiol. Meas. 20 385
Chen Bao-Qiu et al 2005 Chinese Phys. Lett. 22 302
J S Lee et al 2000 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 15 267
P J Dunmore-Buyze et al 2002 Physiol. Meas. 23 555