J R Verkouteren et al 2008 Meas. Sci. Technol. 19 115101 doi:10.1088/0957-0233/19/11/115101
J R Verkouteren, J L Coleman, R A Fletcher, W J Smith, G A Klouda and G Gillen
Show affiliationsA methodology was developed to evaluate particle collection efficiencies from swipe sampling of trace residues. Swipe sampling is used for many applications where trace residues must be collected, including the evaluation of radioactive particle contamination and the analysis of explosives and contraband at screening checkpoints using ion mobility spectrometry (IMS). Collection efficiencies were evaluated for micrometer-sized polystyrene latex (PSL) spheres with respect to the particle size and mode of deposition, collection trap, surface type and swiping force. Test surfaces containing particles were prepared under controlled conditions and swiped with a reproducible technique that allows for the evaluation of frictional forces. Collection efficiencies were determined by optical imaging and particle counting. Of the two IMS collection traps studied, the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) trap has significantly lower collection efficiencies. This is likely to be due to a combination of texture and composition. The larger (42 µm diameter) particles are collected more efficiently than the smaller (9 µm diameter) particles. Particles in a matrix similar to latent fingerprints are collected more efficiently than dry particles. Applying greater force during swiping does not greatly improve collection efficiencies. This fact, coupled with the observation that many particles are detached but not collected, implies that improvements in collection efficiency are dependent on improvements in adhesion of the particles to the collection surface, rather than larger forces to detach the particles.
89.60.-k Environmental studies
82.80.-d Chemical analysis and related physical methods of analysis
Accelerators, beams and electromagnetism
Instrumentation and measurement
Environmental and Earth science
Issue 11 (November 2008)
Received 3 July 2008
Published 22 September 2008
J R Verkouteren et al 2008 Meas. Sci. Technol. 19 115101
John Abelson et al 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 450301
Andrew Randono 2008 Class. Quantum Grav. 25 235017
Wei Guo and Herbert H Sawin 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 194014
M X Shi et al 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 455301
A Di Cicco and A Filipponi 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 011001
Ara Go and Gun Sang Jeon 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 485602
P Lagarde et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012079
D Gómez-Ullate, S Lombardo, M Mañas, M Mazzocco, F Nijhoff and M Sommacal 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 480201
T Lappi 2008 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 35 104052