V Pop et al 2005 Meas. Sci. Technol. 16 R93 doi:10.1088/0957-0233/16/12/R01
V Pop1, H J Bergveld2, P H L Notten3,4 and P P L Regtien1
Show affiliationsFrom the early days of its discovery, humanity has depended on electricity, a phenomenon without which our technological advancements would not have been possible. With the increased need for mobility, people moved to portable power storage—first for wheeled applications, then for portable and finally nowadays wearable use. Several types of rechargeable battery systems, including those of lead–acid, nickel–cadmium, nickel–metal hydride, lithium ion and lithium-ion polymer exist in the market. The most important of them will be discussed in this review. Almost as long as rechargeable batteries have existed, systems able to give an indication about the state-of-charge (SoC) of a battery have been around. Several methods, including those of direct measurements, book-keeping and adaptive systems (Bergveld et al 2002 Battery Management Systems, Design by Modelling (Philips Research Book Series) vol 1 (Boston: Kluwer)) are known in the art for determining the SoC of a cell or battery of cells. An accurate SoC determination method and an understandable and reliable SoC display to the user will improve the performance and reliability, and will ultimately lengthen the lifetime of the battery. However, many examples of poor accuracy and reliability can be found in practice (Bergveld et al 2002, cited above). This review presents an overview on battery technology and the state-of-the-art of SoC methods. The goal of all the presented SoC indication methods is to design an SoC indication system capable of providing an accurate SoC indication under all realistic user conditions, including those of spread—in both battery and user behaviour, a large temperature and current range and ageing of the battery.
82.47.Cb Lead-acid, nickel-metal hydride and other batteries
Issue 12 (December 2005)
Received 3 March 2005, in final form 28 April 2005
Published 31 October 2005
V Pop et al 2005 Meas. Sci. Technol. 16 R93
Y Sarazin et al 2002 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 44 2445
E Sezgin and P Sundell 2001 Class. Quantum Grav. 18 3241
A.K. Hui et al 2009 Nucl. Fusion 49 115025
K Kanaya et al 1978 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 11 2425
J Larsson 2001 Meas. Sci. Technol. 12 1835
Eugene Waluschka 2003 Class. Quantum Grav. 20 S171
Tomáš Tyc and Ulf Leonhardt 2008 New J. Phys. 10 115038
Y. H. Zhang et al. 2005 ApJ 629 686
T Martens et al 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 122002