X Tu and C Trägårdh 2002 Meas. Sci. Technol. 13 1079 doi:10.1088/0957-0233/13/7/315
X Tu and C Trägårdh
Show affiliationsMethods of analysing and interpreting two-dimensional velocity field data in order to understand the scales of turbulence of bubbly two-phase flow were developed. Reynolds decomposition and large eddy simulation (LES) decompositions (low-pass filtering), in conjunction with proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) energy spectra analysis, as well as adjusted convective decomposition (constant convection velocity is gas bubble velocity) were applied to analyse the structure of turbulence. Particle image velocimetry was applied for velocity measurements. Decomposition analysis was performed for the local velocity around gas bubbles in a chosen region. Various decomposition methodologies were applied for interpretation of the results and it was found that the number of eddies revealed and vorticity magnitude varied with the decomposition method used. In particular, LES decomposition was found to perform better at showing smaller eddies. POD indicated the energy changes quantitatively through the spatial energy spectra, while the comparison of single-phase flow with bubbly two-phase flow offered an efficient way of decomposing the total velocity.
A combination of convective decomposition and POD was applied to the energy spectra level in order to obtain a novel view of the turbulence energy introduced by the gas bubbles.
47.55.Kf Multiphase and particle-laden flows
47.27.T- Turbulent transport processes
47.80.-v Instrumentation and measurement methods in fluid dynamics
Issue 7 (July 2002)
Received 5 December 2001, accepted for publication 21 May 2002, in final form 21 May 2002
Published 20 June 2002
X Tu and C Trägårdh 2002 Meas. Sci. Technol. 13 1079
N. G. Semaltianos et al 2008 EPL 84 47001
G Jones and J Woods 1976 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 9 799
Ralf Lenke et al 2002 J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 4 309
K Gunther et al 1976 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 9 1139
S F Edwards and J W V Grant 1973 J. Phys. A: Math. Nucl. Gen. 6 1169
H Debéda et al 1997 Meas. Sci. Technol. 8 99
V Chawla et al 1994 Smart Mater. Struct. 3 107
J Stephen et al 1975 J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 8 607
Amir Karniel et al 2005 J. Neural Eng. 2 S250