X F Fan et al 2008 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20 235221 doi:10.1088/0953-8984/20/23/235221
X F Fan1, H D Sun1, Z X Shen1, Jer-Lai Kuo1 and Y M Lu2
Show affiliationsThe phase stabilities and structural and electronic properties of three zinc-based oxide alloy systems (CaxZn1−xO, CdxZn1−xO and MgxZn1−xO) are studied by first-principle methods. We examine all alloy configurations in three 16-atom supercells (1 × 1 × 2 B1 phase structure, 2 × 2 × 1 and 2 × 1 × 2 B4 phase structures) and utilize symmetry of the bulk materials to reduce the amount of calculation. Taking into account the contribution of the alloy statistics, we have drawn the regions of phase stability for CaxZn1−xO (0.25<x<0.375), MgxZn1−xO (0.375<x<0.5) and CdxZn1−xO (0.75<x<0.875). We have also analyzed lattice constants (a and c), structural parameter u and the bond lengths in the wurtzite phases. We found that the averaged lattice constants of MgxZn1−xO and CaxZn1−xO do not follow the Vegard rule and this is related to the degree of instability of the wurtzite MgO and CaO. Wurtzite CaO is not stable and turns into hexagonal CaO upon geometry optimization. The calculated band gaps are found to be consistent with the experimental values for alloys CdxZn1−xO and MgxZn1−xO. The bowing parameters for alloys MgxZn1−xO and CdxZn1−xO are estimated to be 0.87 and 1.30 eV, respectively.
Issue 23 (11 June 2008)
Received 1 February 2008, in final form 12 April 2008
Published 6 May 2008
X F Fan et al 2008 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20 235221
J Hwang et al 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 125208
S-H Lee et al 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 145259
Chenliang Li et al 2009 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42 075404
Warren E Pickett and Helmut Eschrig 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 315203
Jingyun Zhang and Jer-lai Kuo 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 015402
A V Karpov et al 2008 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 35 035104
Jonathan Barrett and Matthew Leifer 2009 New J. Phys. 11 033024
S. M. Shapiro et al 2007 EPL 77 56004
F. Camilo et al 2009 ApJ 700 L34