Stephanie N Bogle et al 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 455204 doi:10.1088/0953-8984/19/45/455204
Stephanie N Bogle1, Paul M Voyles2, Sanjay V Khare1,3 and John R Abelson2,4
Show affiliationsFluctuation electron microscopy (FEM) is explicitly sensitive to 3- and 4-body atomic correlation functions in amorphous materials; this is sufficient to establish the existence of structural order on the nanoscale, even when the radial distribution function extracted from diffraction data appears entirely amorphous. However, it remains a formidable challenge to invert the FEM data into a quantitative model of the structure. Here, we quantify the FEM method for a-Si by forward simulating the FEM data from a family of high quality atomistic models. Using a modified WWW method, we construct computational models that contain 10–40 vol% of topologically crystalline grains, 1–3 nm in diameter, in an amorphous matrix and calculate the FEM signal, which consists of the statistical variance V (k) of the dark-field image as a function of scattering vector k. We show that V (k) is a complex function of the size and volume fraction of the ordered regions present in the amorphous matrix. However, the ratio of the variance peaks as a function of k affords the size of the ordered regions; and the magnitude of the variance affords a semi-quantitative measure of the volume fraction. We have also compared models that contain various amounts of strain in the ordered regions. This analysis shows that the amount of strain in realistic models is sufficient to mute variance peaks at high k. We conclude with a comparison between the model results and experimental data.
61.43.Dq Amorphous semiconductors, metals, and alloys
61.46.-w Structure of nanoscale materials
61.43.Bn Structural modeling: serial-addition models, computer simulation
Issue 45 (14 November 2007)
Received 28 August 2007
Published 24 October 2007
Stephanie N Bogle et al 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 455204
D J Kaup and Jianke Yang 2009 Inverse Problems 25 105010
J Lenells and A S Fokas 2009 Inverse Problems 25 115006
N Unno et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 191 012014
M Kurka et al 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 141002
C Leighton et al 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 315219
V K Aswal et al 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 116101
Ming Zhao et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 188 012020
A Bernardi et al 2007 Nanotechnology 18 475401
Tomoaki Nogawa and Takehisa Hasegawa 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 145001